100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Criminology unit 4 case studies £6.36   Add to cart

Other

Criminology unit 4 case studies

 0 view  0 purchase

This is a summary of the different case studies that are useful/ relevant in your unit 4 work. Each case study is under their own section which they are most useful with information about how it links to that area

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • October 31, 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (95)
avatar-seller
alishamansell
Unit 4 case studies

Judicial precedent

Donoghue V Stevenson
In 1932 a woman visited a cafe and bought a binger beer. She found a snail in her drink
which caused her to fall ill. She sued the manufacturer as they owe a duty of care to their
customers. This created a modern law of negligence.
Daniels V White
In 1938 a man bought some lemonade but felt a burning sensation in his mouth when he
drank it. It was found that the drink contained a corrosive metal. Daniels sued the
manufacturer and the previous case was referred to.

Statutory interpretation

Smith V Hughes
In 1960 two women were prosecuted after soliciting from an upstairs window. They were
charged under the Street Offences Act 1959 which made it an offence to solicit in a public
place. The mischief rule was applied to this law because they were within the mischief the
act was aimed at even though they were in a private place.

The crime control model

Colin Stagg
- Key focus in the case (murder of Rachel Nickell) was to get a suspect charged and
convicted. Police failed to consider any other suspect as they wanted a swift
conviction. The victims murder provoked a strong public reaction and demand for the
case to be solved as quickly as possible.
- Police felt sure that the suspect was guilty and used all measure available to try and
get evidence- breached his rights and privacy- honeytrap mission

Barry George
- Police failed to consider other possibilities
- Used unreliable forensic evidence to convict
- Key focus in the case was on securing a conviction at any cost
- Victims murder provoked a strong public reaction and demand for the case to be
solved as quickly as possible
- Even after conviction was overturned he still wasn’t seen as innocent enough to
warrant compensation

The due process model

Sion Jenkins
- On the 2nd of July 1998 he was sentenced to life for murder of his foster daughter
Billie-Jo.
- On 9th February 2006 after two appeals and two retrials, he was finally acquitted. He
had spent 6 years in prison

, - He was given the opportunity to exercise his statutory right of appealing against the
conviction thus allowing for a retrial

Gary weddell
- Policeman for 25 years then charged with the murder of his wife.
- He had been granted bail by his brother against the wishes of the cps
- Whilst on bail he killed his mother-in-law and them himself
- This case uses the due process model as everyone is presumed to be granted bail
unless there is reason not to. It’s a statutory right.

Thompson and venables
- Killed James Bulger in a chucky inspired attack
- The boys had their identities changed to protect them from the public and media
- They were taken to the courtroom before the trial so that they could familiarise
themselves
- Article 6 and article 3- ensured they warren’t tortured

Aims of punishment

Retribution
John Christie
- Murdered 8 people
- received the death penalty which fits the ‘life for a life’ part.

Wayne Couzens
- Police officer who abused his power and kidnapped, raped and murdered Sarah
Everard
- Received a whole life sentence meaning he will die in prison
- Fits an ‘eye for an eye’

Rehabilitation

Christopher Topliss
- Jailed for sex offences in 2017
- Was released from prison and served a three year community order which will focus
on rehabilitation

Deterrence

London riots 2011
- Harsh punishments were given for even the smallest crimes
- A 23 year old man was sentenced to 6 months in prison for stealing £3.50 of bottled
water
- 2 men were jailed for four years each after admitting they used Facebook to incite
disorder, even though nothing resulted from the posts.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alishamansell. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.36. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

84866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£6.36
  • (0)
  Add to cart