100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LRM2601 Assignment 6 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 Course Labour Relations Management: Macro (LRM2601) £2.04   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LRM2601 Assignment 6 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 Course Labour Relations Management: Macro (LRM2601)

 10 views  1 purchase
  • Module
  • Institution
  • Book

LRM2601 Assignment 6 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 Course Labour Relations Management: Macro (LRM2601)

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

  • November 6, 2024
  • 26
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
LRM2601


Assignment 6 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 -
DUE 6 November 2024

,Read the case study and then answer the questions that follow. A TOUGH SITUATION

AT GOLDEN WHEELS TRANSPORT SERVICES Sipho is a young, ambitious man pursuing
a Diploma in Logistics Management through a part-time programme at the University of

South Africa. As the primary breadwinner for his family, he supports his younger sister,
who is still in school, and his mother, a former domestic worker now unable to work due

to severe arthritis. Recently, Sipho secured a job as a junior dispatcher at Golden Wheels
Transport Services, a Johannesburg-based logistics company specialising in transporting

goods across South Africa.




QUERY 1




1.1 Instance of Perceived Distributive Injustice: A particular illustration of distributive
injustice in this case is the reduction of employees' overtime compensation, a

substantial component of their income, while senior managers, including Mr. Mkhize,
persist in receiving annual bonuses despite the company's financial difficulties.

The equity criteria assesses fairness by examining the proportional relationship between

people' contributions and their corresponding benefits. Employees perceive this move
as inequitable, as they work extended hours and depend on overtime for financial

stability, yet are deprived of this crucial revenue while senior managers earn bonuses.
This disparity in compensation compromises the perceived equity of income distribution

within the organization, as individuals reliant on overtime wages are disadvantaged,
while senior staff continue to enjoy supplementary benefits.

, 1.2 Illustration of Perceived Procedural Injustice: An instance of procedural injustice

occurs when Mr. Mkhize convened a meeting to elucidate the decrease of overtime yet
prohibited employees from posing questions, offering recommendations, or

deliberating alternate cost-saving measures. Furthermore, when Sipho suggested
investigating alternative methods to minimize expenses without impacting overtime, Mr.

Mkhize categorically rejected his proposal.




Clarification Utilizing Procedural Justice Standards:




Representativeness: This criterion mandates that all stakeholders affected by a decision
must have their perspectives taken into account during the decision-making process.

Mr. Mkhize prohibited employees from expressing their ideas or suggesting alternatives
during the discussion, thereby neglecting to represent their interests in the decision-

making process. The absence of representation caused employees to view the process
as dismissive and inequitable.

Bias Suppression: Bias suppression necessitates that decision-makers refrain from

prejudice and personal biases. In this instance, Mr. Mkhize exhibited partiality towards
senior management by neglecting the employees' requirement for overtime

compensation while maintaining bonuses for upper-level executives. His dismissive
reaction to employees' proposals and concerns indicates a bias toward management,

exacerbating employees' view of an inequitable and unilateral procedure.




1.3 Clarification of Perceived Injustice and Its Effect on Trust: Mr. Mkhize's actions
were regarded as unjust due to his reduction of vital income for employees and his

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller masterstudy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.04  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart