Summary
Summary Contract Law Seminar 9
- Module
- Contract Law
- Institution
- University Of Chester (UoC)
Contract Law Seminar 9 answers
[Show more]
Content preview
Contract seminar 91) A misrepresentation is a false statement of existing or past fact made by party X to party Y
before or at the time of contracting, on which Party Y relied in contracting.
Damages
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Derry v Peek (1889)
Where there has been a fraudulent misrep, the innocent party is entitled to rescind the
contract and claim damages. The damages that are awarded are not based on contractual
principles but the damages available in the tort of deceit. There is thus no requirement that
the damages are foreseeable.
Negligent Misstatement
Hedley Byrne v Heller
Misrepresentation Act
Howard Marine & Dredging Co Ltd v A Ogden & Sons (Excavations) Ltd [1978]
S.2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 states that the same remedies are available where the
statement was made negligently as if it were made fraudulently. Royscott v Rogerson
confirmed that the principle in fraudulent misrep relating to tortious damages applied also
in negligent misrep
Innocent Misrepresentation
Section 2(2) Misrepresentation Act 1967
Under s.2(2) Misrepresentation Act 1967 the remedies for an innocent misrep are rescission
or damages in lieu of rescission. The claimant cannot claim both. Damages are assessed on
normal contractual principles.
2) Fraudulent misrep
Lord Herschell defined fraudulent misrepresentation in Derry v Peek as a statement which is
made either:
i) knowing it to be false,
ii) without belief in its truth, or
iii) recklessly, careless as to whether it be true or false
The burden of proof lies on the claimant
3) For all types the remedy of rescission is available. This is putting the parties back in their pre-
contractual position. Each party gives back the benefit which they have received under the
contract. However, it is not always possible to rescind the contract and in some
circumstances the right to rescind may be lost.
4) The underlying principle of the law of contract is still caveat emptor (“let the buyer
beware”). The situations in which a contract will be avoided on the ground that one or both
parties have made a mistake will be somewhat limited.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller studentrlj. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now