100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Tort Law: Negligence - Breach of Duty 2: Proving Negligence £3.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Tort Law: Negligence - Breach of Duty 2: Proving Negligence

 43 views  0 purchase

I achieved a high first in this module (78%) these are my notes from the Principles of Tort Law (Rachel Mulheron) textbook - laid out in a problem question format, all you have to do is apply them to the facts of any problem question.

Preview 1 out of 9  pages

  • Unknown
  • April 16, 2020
  • 9
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (12)
avatar-seller
laelaw
• The starting point – the test (Blythe v Birmingham Waterworks)

• ‘The defendants might have been liable for negligence, if, unintentionally, they
omitted to do that which a reasonable person would have done, or did that which a
person taking reasonable precautions would not have done.’ – objective standard

• Foreseeability of harm

• Barrett v English LBC Lord Hutton ‘court must be satisfied that the conduct went
beyond mere errors of judgement in the exercise of a discretion and constituted
conduct which can be regarded as negligent.
• Means a “real risk, and not just a mere possibility”: Khan v Harrow Council [2013]
• merely possible risks may be foreseeable, but they are not reasonably foreseeable.
risk must be likely enough that a reasonable D, careful of the safety of his neighbour,
wouldn’t think it right to neglect or ignore the risk Wagon Mound (No 2)

PRELIMINARY MATTERS:

I. proving the requisite foreseeability

narrower foreseeability test:
 at beach stage, the court is required to assess whether the event or accident was so unlikely
(i.e. unforeseeable) as not to require any precautionary steps or alternative course of action
to be taken by D.
o sometimes DoC can be owed to C, but no breach may be found because the event
was unforeseeable;
 Bolton v Stone hit by cricket ball. Only happened 6 times in 38 years, the risk
of injury was too small. Ordinarily careful man doesn’t take risks against
every little thing.
 Whippey v Jones dog accosted C who fell into a river. CA- no breach as the
dog did not have a tendency to do things like that. More than remote.
 Previous occurrences- never happened previously, does not render the risk unforeseeable.
o Abouzaid v Mothercare (UK) ltd- Chair’s elasticised strap slipped his grip and the
buckle hit him in the eye, causing retina injury. No breach.
o Bunker v Charles Brand Son Ltd- the mere fact that no accident had happened in the
past did not absolve from taking further precautions
o Bolton v Stone- just because it did occur before does not mean that = liability.
o Holton v Jackson- only hit someone 2 times before in the 16 years of the golf
course’s existence.
 Stompson v Wolverhampton- where there has been previous complaints to
D about similar events.
o Cornish Glenroy Blair-Ford v CRS Adventures Ltd- lack of previous occurrences of the
accident can sometimes be because C’s behaviour was so unusual, makes it difficult
to prove breach.
 Known Susceptibilities
o D knows of C’s susceptibilities to injury- D has foreseen the risk
 D’s knowledge may relate to its systems or employers vulnerabilities
 Paris v Stepney BC- worked in garage had one functioning eye, was
not given goggles. And D was also aware of C’s vulnerabilities

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laelaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80435 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart