100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PLSI 1018 Question and answers rated A+ £11.31
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PLSI 1018 Question and answers rated A+

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Module
  • PLSI
  • Institution
  • PLSI

PLSI 1018 Question and answers rated A+ Schenck v. United States - correct answer 1919--Case involving limits on free speech. Established the "clear and present danger" principle. In favor of US Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) - correct answer speech that does not call for illegal action is pr...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • January 2, 2025
  • 4
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • PLSI
  • PLSI
avatar-seller
PLSI 1018 Question and answers rated
A+
Schenck v. United States - correct answer ✔1919--Case involving limits on
free speech. Established the "clear and present danger" principle. In favor of
US


Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) - correct answer ✔speech that does not call for
illegal action is protected, and even speech that does call for illegal action is
protected if the action is not "imminent" or there is reason to believe that the
listeners will not take action. In favor of Brandenburg in accords to the 1st
ammendment


Engel v. Vitale (1962) - correct answer ✔Prohibited state-sponsored
recitation of prayer in public schools by virtue of 1st Amendment's
establishment clause . I favor of NY


Wisconsin v. Yoder - correct answer ✔Amish children do not have to go to
school until they are 16---they may stop after the 8th grade-- 1st
ammendment-- In favor of the amish


Reynolds v. US - correct answer ✔Court ruled that one cannot use religion
as a defense to the crime of polygamy. Court ruled that religious practices that
impair the public interest do not fall under the First Amendment.-1st
ammendment-In favor of US


Employment Division v. Smith - correct answer ✔First Amendment/Free
Exercise Clause - determined that the state could deny unemployment
benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote,
even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Although states
have the power to accommodate otherwise illegal acts done in pursuit of

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Academia199. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £11.31. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50990 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£11.31
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added