Full document of all possible essay titles that can come up in Meta-ethics. Essay plans are detailed and well structured with clear line of argument and named scholarly views. The essay plans can be adapted to be used for any title. Also includes list of all possible essay titles for the topic. You...
Critically asses the view that intuitionism is the most plausible theory when assessing the value of
ethical language (40)
‘The word ‘good’ cannot be defined’ (40)
To what extent to ethical terms reflect natural properties (40)
‘good is meaningful’ (40)
The terms good bad right and wrong reflect only what is in the mind of people using them (40)
Good is best explained by emotivism (40)
Asses the view that good bad right and wrong are meaningless terms
, THE TERM GOOD HAS NO MEANING (40)
INTRO:
- A question highlighting the arguments of meta-ethics
- Can take a cognitivist approach – good has factual meaning (ethical naturalism and intuitionism)
- Non-cognitivism approach- ethical terms are not meaningful factually- clear distinction between
facts and values (emotivism)- believe good bad right and wrong reflect what is in the mind of the
person
My line of argument:
- Would follow the views of emotivism- good does have meaning but not in a factual way- in the
way it expresses emotion and personal opinion
PARA 1: ETHICAL NATURALISM
Against- why defining good is possible
FH Bradley
- Values are factual (good)- they can be defines using the natural properties of the world
- Moral truths can be proves and moral language can be factual- defined using empirical
knowledge and and sense experience from the natural world
Can be supported:
- Peter singer- having definitions of moral terms allows for ‘effective altruism’ (utilitarian)- if
ethical statements are factual then people are more likely to be charitable
- Example: if they see images of people starving for a charity campaign (using empirical
evidence to see that something is clearly wrong) then are more likely to donate money than if
they were just hearing about it from someone
For- why this doesn’t work
- Bradley is committing the naturalistic fallacy- stated by GE Moore
- Although we can have knowledge of ethical terms, they cannot be defined
- It is illogical to define non natural things with natural properties
- Hayward- ‘a term that is indefinable cannot be defines, and any attempt to define it is
fallacious”
So
- Ethical naturalism is not convincing as it fails to acknowledge the complexities of moral
language and cannot prove the meaning of good through naturalistic terms
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isabelgishen. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £8.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
