100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Defences to Negligence - Tort Law (LLB) £2.99
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Defences to Negligence - Tort Law (LLB)

 58 views  0 purchase

Defences to Negligence Summarised Notes for the Tort Law module, LLB, at City, University of London - can of course be used for other universities as well! Should be used with the full bundle of notes!

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 20, 2020
  • 2
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (16)
avatar-seller
law-notes
DEFENCES TO NEGLIGENCE

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE – claimant was at fault
 Partial, not complete defence – fault is found on part claimant and D to damage suffered, then
damages reduced to extent thinks just and equitable

Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945, s1(1): where any person suffers damage as the
result partly his own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons, a claim in respect of
that damage shall not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage…

s.1: damages will be reduced where damage is suffered partly as a result of claimant’s fault both
parties fault must be a cause of damage suffered

Froom v Butcher [1976]
Claimant injured in a car accident due to negligence of D, claimant not wearing a seat belt held
reduced by £100, would have been injured with or without a seat belt

Badger v Ministry of Defence [2005]
Mr Badger died of lung cancer, had been negligently exposed to asbestos at work, he contributed to
cancer by smoking as well, smoke 20 a day from age of 16 held reduced by 20%

Gough v Thorne [1966]
13 year old tried to cross road with brother, lorry stopped for them, waved to indicate it was safe to
cross, D negligently ran over claimant, she assumed it was safe to cross as lorry driver indicated it
was safeheld young child cannot be guilty of contributory negligence

Reeves v Metropolitan Police [2000]
Police cell, officers warned of suicidal, saw doctor who stated no depression, latch open, hung
himself Held police duty to prevent, but 50% due to contributory negligence

CONSENT
 Volenti non fit injuria= willing acceptance of risk either expressly or impliedly agreed to take legal
risk no wrong is done to one who consents
 Must consent to negligence and not just general risk of injury

Wooldridge v Sumner [1963]: claimant, a photographer seriously injured when D, a participant in a
horse show, rode his horse too fast and veered into the area where the photographer was
standing held no breach of duty, but also no consent as consent needs to be for risk of injury

Morris v Murry [1990]
Claimant and D drinking, D, who had pilot licence suggested take a flight, claimant agreed and drove
them both to airfield, crashed, D killed and claimant seriously injured, autopsy revealed D consumed
17 Whiskeys D raised Volenti Held: allowed, as accepting a ride in an aircraft from an obviously
heavily intoxicated pilot was so glaringly dangerous taken to have voluntarily accepted risk of injury
and waived the right to compensation

Legislation regulates extent to which D can use consent as a defence
 Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, ss.1 and 2; Consumer Rights Act 2015, s.65 and 62
 Road Traffic Act 1988, s.149




1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller law-notes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added