100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Defence - Equity & Trusts Law (LLB) £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Defence - Equity & Trusts Law (LLB)

 22 views  0 purchase

Defences - Change of position, passing on, estoppel by Rep bona fide purchaser no notice - Summarised Notes for the Equity and Trusts Law module, LLB, at City, University of London (achieved a 1st class using these) - can of course be used for other universities as well! Should be used with the f...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • May 21, 2020
  • 3
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (13)
avatar-seller
law-notes
DEFENCES
Change of position, passing on, estoppel by Rep + bona fide purchaser no notice

CHANGE OF POSITION
 Available where D has received property and on faith of receipt of that property, suffered some
change in personal circumstances
 ‘where an innocent Ds position is so changed that will suffer an injustice to called to repay,
injustice to repay outweighs injustice of denying plaintiff’s restitution’ (Westdeutsch v Islington)
 Change of position has grown as part of restitution of unjust enrichment
 Where D forgoes an opportunity to take benefit from another source in reliance of payment from
claimant, D is entitled to include such reliance in defence
 D required to act in good faith for defence of change of position
 Earn interest or saved from bank charges account for it e.g. D got 10k + 10k from interest

*Restitution point: If receives stolen property innocently, so is unjustly enriched, got property in
expense of someone else, change of position defence is where altered their position

Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale [1991]: D casino received money from a solicitor, Cass, who appropriated
that money from a law firm’s client and gambled it away at Ds casino, law firm sought to recover lost
moneys from casino by equitable and common law tracing claims as well as personal liability to
account for participation in breach of trust –
 Open nature of defence of change of position: can be very generally applied, just need
expenditure of money balanced with any other detrimental act, against injustice of permitting
claimant to trace their property rights into property in Ds hands
 Bad faith as a barrier: if bad faith cannot use
oBarros Mattos v MacDaniels [2004]: change of position unavailable where acted illegally, but if
so minor can be ignored on de minimis principle (so small can be ignored) and thus change of
position available, fraudster stole money from bank, passed it to D, D then distributed money
according to Ds instructions, sought to use change of position against claims of knowing receipt
+ restitution on amount stolen held acted illegally so cannot rely on defence had to account
for entire amount received

Scottish Equitable v Derby [2000]: pensioner received £172k from a pension fund by mistake, issue
could pension fund recover mistaken payment, pensioner sought rely on change of position on
receipt of money, he spent £9k on family home  held entitled to keep 9k but rest of 172k he had to
give back, as he spent the 9k in receipt of the money he spent in good faith

Philip Collins v Davis [2000]: overpayments to musician by mistake, sought to retain, employer
proposed recover money by withholding future royalties, musician stated he changed lifestyle in
reliance on receipt of money held musician has burden of proving defence entitled to resist
recovery of half overpayments as he changed lifestyle in reliance of receiving them
 Where payment is made mistakenly without any representation D entitled to money and sum is
so large D ought to reasonable have realised was mistake, no defence of change of position
Could affect justice as could be inequitable and unconscionable, thus unjust to allow a recipient of
money paid under a mistake to deny restitution to the payer in terms of unjust enrichment

Whether incurring future liabilities can amount to change of position
 Change of position by committing to legal liability which will take effect in the future
 Principle authority against change of position in the future – South Tyneside v Svenska




1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller law-notes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart