100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Innominate Terms Evaluation £2.99
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Innominate Terms Evaluation

 212 views  2 purchases
  • Institution
  • OCR

This evaluation grid includes 5 points of law that need evaluating, a description of the law with relevant cases, an issue/ criticism, a developed point, a well developed point and reforms. When I used my notes on this grid to answer an Evaluation question I received full marks.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • July 3, 2020
  • 2
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (19)
avatar-seller
sophiestanford2002
Essay Framework for Evaluation Questions – Section B’s, Q.3 (25 marks)
10 marks AO1 DESCRIBE 15 marks AO3 EVALUATE
Point of Law AO1 Description of the law AO3 Issue/Criticism AO3 Why a problem AO3 Why not a problem

Innominate terms are terms without There are no clear The courts decide whether Despite this, the vague wording of
classification. The court will look at the guidelines as to what the consequence means that innominate terms allows the courts
consequence of the breach rather than consequence would allow the contract should be to cover every eventuality and it
Innominate terms its classification. There is a right to that the contract could be repudiated which can lead to means that nothing will be
repudiate the contract where it is fair to repudiated inconsistent decisions excluded simply because it wasn’t
both parties (Hong Kong Fir Shipping thought of when a definition was
Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha) set.
Innominate terms look at the This could be considered For both conditions and It prevents long drawn out court
consequence of breach and not the to be unfair warranties the breach is cases because one side argues it
breach itself looked at it seems unfair that was intended to be a condition
this is changed because the whereas the other argues it was
Doesn’t focus on term isn’t classified. Could be only intended to be a warranty in
breach that something that could order to avoid having to repudiate
have been a condition will the contract. Not focusing on the
not end up with repudiation breach allows that there is flexibility
simply because it wasn’t
named as a condition
Innominate terms don’t have a This leads to vagueness as Most lay people will not be This will only occur if the parties
classification to what they actually are aware of the difference have failed to label the terms as a
which could cause between a condition and an condition or a warranty and it
Vagueness in the confusion. innominate term. This could would seem that if it didn’t fit into
wording cause confusion for the one of those categories it would be
parties as to which term they appropriate to look at a different
would be considered to be aspect
most like and the remedies
available
Conditions go to the root of the contract It could be argued that the This is because allowing the Due to the creation of innominate
and are the most important term creation of innominate parties to specify whether a terms it means that the court will
(Poussard v Spiers). Warranties are terms has led to less term is a condition, or a not consider what the parties
minor terms in a contract which if freedoms of contract warranty respects the actually meant if a term wasn’t
Conditions/ breached only entitles the other party principle of freedom of clearly labelled as a condition or a
warranty to claim for damages (Bettini v Guy) contract which allows the warranty seeing that there is
parties to maintain control another classification. This could
and predictability in a be very unfair as one party may not
contract by determining in be able to repudiate the contract
advance what will happen in even though this would appear to
certain eventualities. be fair. The fact that this is a courts
decision may lead to very
inconsistent results in similar court

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sophiestanford2002. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99  2x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added