A section of the appendices detailing primary research, relating to A01 and A04 of the specification. The document discusses an interview on current views of psychopathy. It begins with the aim of the interview, followed by the interview questions and results. The primary data is then evaluated and...
I will conduct the following primary research on students in my form, my immediate family and my
next door neighbours to identify common misconceptions about psychopathy which I can address in
my dissertation, and to see which philosophical statements I should spend more time considering
and researching. I will conduct the interviews using a standardised procedure. However, due to time
constraint I will do group interviews with my class (and one-on-one with the others).
1. How would you define psychopathy?
2. Do you think that psychopaths are threats to the public? Why?
3. Have you ever known/heard of someone who you would describe as a psychopath?
4. Do you think psychopathy can be treated?
5. Is it important to treat psychopaths or are prisons sufficient enough?
6. Do you think it is right to treat all psychopaths?
7. Should different psychopaths be treated in different ways?
8. Can you think of any ways we could treat psychopaths?
Results:
I found that the main definition of psychopathy was related to things such as insanity and
criminality. Due to the misconception that severe criminals (i.e. those that commit crimes such as
murder) are all psychopaths, they were instantly deemed as a threat to the public in need of
treatment. However, they were thought of as being incurable, sparking my interest in determining
the potential causes of criminality. For the same reasons, famous serial killers like Ted Bundy and
Charles Whitman sprung into people’s minds, even though they were not psychiatrically diagnosed
as psychopaths. However, a few people mentioned Dennis Rader, who was a psychopathic killer.
Everyone agreed that prisons were not sufficient enough, as things like reoffending rates are high
(inspiring me to base the success of treatments on rates of recidivism). Some believed that talk-
based therapies and showing the psychopath their victims would be successful treatments as these
encourage empathy from the psychopaths.
Evaluation:
Strengths:
This is an example of primary research, which is reliable as I collected the data
myself. I could ask questions that I could not necessarily find answers to online.
I used a standardised procedure to ensure that the process was as valid as possible. I
read questions in order to prevent interviewees from guessing the aim of my
findings too quickly, ensuring that their answers were as realistic and genuine as
possible. The process was relaxed as it took the form of group interviews, ensuring
everyone felt comfortable and not pressured into giving desired responses.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller safiamahmood182. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
