100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LPC Exam Notes - Dispute Resolution Workshop 6/7 (University of Law) £3.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LPC Exam Notes - Dispute Resolution Workshop 6/7 (University of Law)

3 reviews
 370 views  0 purchase

Complete notes covering Workshop 8 of the University of Law's Dispute Resolution Module. - Tactical Applications and Settlement - Summary Judgement - Interim Payments - Security for Costs - Discontinuation of a Claim - Settlement and Tomlin Orders - Part 36 Offers (fully explained)

Preview 1 out of 11  pages

  • November 12, 2020
  • 11
  • 2020/2021
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (36)

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: livcp • 9 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mollyguest • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: freddygummer15 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
izalpcnotes
Tactical Applications and Settlement
Tactical applications

Summary Judgment

Part 24 Civil Procedure Rules
Summary judgment is a procedure by which the court can decide a claim or a particular issue without a trial.
The existence of Summary Judgment acknowledges that certain cases need not run to trial; the aim of the procedure
is to facilitate a quick determination of a case, avoid long-running litigation and save costs where a trial is
unnecessary.

Making a Summary Judgment
Grounds CPR 24.2 - The court may give summary judgment if the respondent has:
 (a) No real prospect of succeeding on or defending the claim AND
 (b) There is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a
trial.
1: No Real Prospect of Succeeding on or Defending the Claim
 In order to defeat an application for summary judgment, the respondent needs more than just an
arguable case.
 It has to be one that has a "real, as opposed to a fanciful, chance of winning" (Swain v Hillman
[1999] EWCA Civ 3053).
 Commonly, applications will focus on (para 1.3, PD24):
o A point of law which means the respondent has no real prospects of succeeding in
his claim.
o Evidence which can reasonably be expected to be available at trial, or the lack of it,
which means the respondent has no real prospects of succeeding e.g. where it is
clear beyond question that the statement of case is contradicted by all the
documents.
o A combination of these.
2: No Other Compelling Reason to Try the Case or Issue
The following may constitute compelling reasons:
(if they are proven, summary judgment not appropriate)
 Need to investigate:
 The respondent may need time to investigate the claim, not having had the opportunity
to do so, and such investigation might provide it with real prospects of success.
o E.g. if the respondent has been unable to contact a witness.
 Difference in facts
 Where one party holds all of the factual cards
 Summary Judgment can be sought prior to disclosure. It is therefore possible that, in
certain cases, one party will be in possession of the majority of the evidence before they
are under an obligation to disclose.
 Where the facts are wholly in the applicant's hands and it would be unjust to enter
judgment without giving the respondent the opportunity to establish a defence in the
light of disclosure, or after serving a request for further information (Harrison v
Bottenheim (1878) 26 WR 362).
 Questionable conduct by the applicant:
 Summary judgment has been refused where the applicant's conduct can be questioned, for
instance where they are being dishonest or devious (Miles v Bull [1969] 1 QB 258).
 The case is particularly complex:
 Summary judgment is not intended to be a substitute for a trial in which the court can
make a detailed investigation of all of the issues. Therefore, particularly complex claims
are less suited to Summary Judgment (Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
(No. 3) [2001] UKHL 16).
 The case is on a novel point of law for which there is little prior authority.
 Swain v Hillman [1999] EWCA Civ 3053

1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller izalpcnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.99
  • (3)
  Add to cart