Presents different philosophers views on the reformulation of the ontological argument. Includes the views of philosophers who criticised the reformulation of the ontological argument.
Philosophers mentioned:
Norman Malcom
Alvin Plantinga
David Hume
Gottlob Frege
Bertrand Russell
Brian Davies
Russe...
Knowledge and Understanding Critical Evaluation
Norman Malcolm – Concludes that Proslogion 3 is more accurate than David Hume – Not possible to take an idea in one’s mind, apply pure
Proslogion 2. logic to that idea and reach a conclusion that is based
- Some versions of the ontological argument are entirely in the external observable universe.
subject to specific criticism; existence is treated as - Existence can’t be treated as a predicate that
a predicate that things have or lack. Malcolm something can ‘have’ or ‘not have’, or which can be
believes P2 is subject to this criticism. added or subtracted from something.
- Malcolm believes P3 doesn't treat existence as a - To think of God as ‘in the mind’ and then to think of
predicate; Anselm is saying that God must exist God as ‘in reality’ is the same thing.
because the concept of God is the concept of a
being whose existence is necessary. Gottlob Frege – Distinguishes between ‘first-order’ and ‘second-order’
- Uses the example of prime numbers in the parable predicates.
‘The Professor and the Fool’ to illustrate that just - ‘First-order’ predicates – Tells one something about
as you know prime numbers exist after they have the nature of something, e.g. ‘the horses are brown.’
been explained to you and you understand this - ‘Second-order’ predicates – Tells one about concepts,
idea, that God must exist when He is explained. e.g. ‘the horses are numerous.’
- This also applies to the equator and love. - Claims Anslem and Descartes mistake existence for a
‘first-order’ predicate when in actual fact it is a
‘second-order’ predicate.
Alvin Plantinga – "Possible worlds" with "infinite possibilities"
- There is a possible world "W" in which there exists Bertrand Russell – Claims Anselm uses the word ‘exist’ incorrectly
a being with 'maximal greatness' because existence can’t be a predicate.
- A being has maximal greatness only if it exists in - Existence is not a property of things but of the
every possible world. ideas of those things.
- Introduces idea of 'maximal excellence' - Put Anselm’s argument into different terms- states
- States that 'maximal greatness' entails 'maximal that labelling and defining something is to provide
excellence' which entails omnipotence, an intention concerning the object under
omniscience and moral perfection. discussion.
- Therefore there is a possible world in which there - Existence is an extension of an intention.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller orlac. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
