100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Written Formalities and Constitution of Trust £5.49
Add to cart

Lecture notes

Written Formalities and Constitution of Trust

 25 views  0 purchase

Lecture notes of 15 pages for the course Equity And Trusts at UoS (.)

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • January 15, 2021
  • 15
  • 2020/2021
  • Lecture notes
  • Fiona
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (13)
avatar-seller
melindahogman
Written Formalities and the Constitution of Trust

Formalities

Necessary Written Formalities
 Depends on the nature of the property.
 Is it personal property?
 Is it real property?
 Depends on whether the person declaring the trust is alive.
 Inter vivos?
 Will?

Declaration of a Trust by Will
 Wills Act 1837 s9(a)(c)(d).
 A will – to be valid – must be made in writing, signed by the testator (or some
person acting on his direction in his presence), in the presence of two
witnesses, who must also attest and sign the will (or acknowledge their
signature) in the presence of the testator.
 To create a valid trust on death, these written formalities must be complied
with:
 Must be in writing.
 Must be signed by the testator.
 Must be signed and attested to by two witnesses.
 Failure to comply with those formalities means that the will would be invalid,
and the testator will be deemed to have died in testate.
 Other rules will apply there has to how the property is distributed.

Inter Vivos Trust of Land
 Law of Property Act 1925 s53(1)(b).
 A declaration of trust respecting any land or interest therein must be
manifested and proved by some writing signed by some person who is able to
declare such a trust or by his will
 To create a valid trust, inter vivos, this written formality must be complied
with:
 Must be in writing.

Inter Vivos Trust of Personalty
 Inter vivos – between living people.
 Personalty – personal property.
 Money.
 Jewellery.
 Paintings.
 No written formalities necessary to create a valid inter vivos express trust of
personal property.
 Oral, verbal declaration that satisfies the 3 certainties will be sufficient.

 Paul v Constance.

,  Husband told his wife that the money in the bank account was ‘as much
yours as it is mine’.
 Court found that he had intended to create a trust.
 Property was certain.
 Beneficiaries were certain.
 An absolute owner of personal property may declare himself to be the trustee of
such property or may declare that such property is to be held by trustees on trust
without the need for any written formalities.

What if the Formalities Are Not Complied With?
 Equity may impose a trust upon a person, even though there was no valid
declaration of one, or where the formalities have not been complied with.
 In some cases, equity implies a trust where it is conscionable to do so.
 Law of Property Act 1925 s53(2).
 ‘This section does not affect the creation or operation of resulting, implied or
constructive trusts’.
 Written formalities are only required for the valid creation of express
trusts.
 Equitable maxim:
 Statute cannot be used as an engine of fraud.
 Rochefoucauld v Boustead (1897).
 The plaintiff had mortgages on several properties and he was in financial
difficulties.
 The defendant bought the properties from the mortgagee, but orally agreed
to hold the properties on trust for the plaintiff subject to mortgage
repayments to the defendant.
 The verbal promise is not compliant with the written formalities.
 The defendant got into financial difficulties and sold the properties on and
became bankrupt.
 The trustee in bankruptcy claimed that the declaration of trust of the
properties was invalid because there had been no writing which was
required to make the trust valid.
 Court said that equity would not allow the statute to be used in this case as
an engine of fraud.
 The land had been conveyed to the defendant under a trust, and it
will be fraud for him to deny the existence of that trust, and treat the
land as if it were his own.
 His conscience was bound even though the written formalities had
not been complied with.
 A fraud will arise where land has been transferred subject to an oral
understanding that it is to be held on trust and then the person to whom it
has been transferred tries to deny the trust and claim absolute title.




Contrast Between Declaration and Disposition

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller melindahogman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added