100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Tort Law: Actionable Damage (psychiatric) Revsion Notes £2.99   Add to cart

Lecture notes

Tort Law: Actionable Damage (psychiatric) Revsion Notes

 32 views  0 purchase

Notes on Actionable Damage - covers Historical Context, the requirements for a Primary Victim, and the requirements for Secondary Victims.

Preview 1 out of 6  pages

  • February 7, 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Lecture notes
  • Dr schnobel
  • All classes
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (7)
avatar-seller
rueakbar
Negligence - Actionable Damage (Psychiatric
Harm)
Introduction
Complexities surrounding Psych Harm:
• Lord Steyn, White v Chief Constable [1999]
1. The complexity of drawing the line between acute grief and psychiatric harm;
2. The prospect of litigation might pose an ‘unconscious disincentive to rehabilitation’;
3. They may impose a disproportionate burden of liability on defendants whose tortious conduct may involve
only a momentary lapse of concentration;
4. Claims of psychiatric harm can involve a potentially much wider group of possible claimants.


Restricting Claims:
• How has this been done in the past?
o 3rd parties
o Omissions
• For claims involving psychiatric harm, courts have utilised two primary methods to limit claims:
o At the damage stage
o At the duty stage


Psychiatric Harm: Historical Context
• Zones of Physical Harm
o ‘The shock, where it operates through the mind, must be a shock which arises from a reasonable fear of
immediate personal injury to oneself. ’


Psychiatric Harm: Historical Context - Dulieu v While & Sons (1901)
Facts:
• C was pregnant, was working behind her husband’s bar.
• One night, a cart driven by D’s employee hit the pub, C went into shock and went into labour giving birth to a
premature baby.
• D argued due to there being no immediate physical injury to C at the scene, they were not liable.
Issue:
• Was shock enough to ground C’s claim?
Held:
• C would have to show that the psychiatric injury suffered first resulted in physical consequences to succeed.
• Thus, psychiatric harm alone was not enough.
• Phillmore J,
“In the case before us the plaintiff, a pregnant woman, was in her house. It is said that she was not the tenant in
possession [but]it was her home, where she had a right, and on some occasions a duty, to be;... It is averred that
by reason of the careless driving of the defendants' servant a pair-horse van came some way into the room, and
so frightened her that serious physical consequences thereby befell her. If these averments be proved, I think that
there was a breach of duty to her for which she can have damages. The difficulty in these cases is to my mind not
one as to the remoteness of the damage, but as to the uncertainty of there being any duty. Once get the duty and
the physical damage following on the breach of duty, and I hold that the fact of one link in the chain of causation
being mental only makes no difference.”


Psychiatric Harm: Historical Context - Bourhill v Young (1943)
Facts:
• C was a fishmonger’s wife; she was about to board a tram car. She heard a collision which was D hitting a car.
• As a result of the collision, C suffered extreme shock, retched and injured her back.
• She approached the scene, sees the body of D who is dead, makes her feel fear and terror.
• She gave birth to a stillborn child due to this incident.
Issue:
• The fear she felt was not to herself, she was not in any harm.
Held:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rueakbar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81113 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart