100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Ontological arguments for God £5.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Ontological arguments for God

 42 views  1 purchase

Exam of 5 pages for the course AS Units 1 and 2 - Introduction to Religious Studies at AQA (Essay question)

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • February 25, 2021
  • 5
  • 2020/2021
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (55)
avatar-seller
smax403
'Can God’s existence be proved ontologically?’ (30)



An ontological argument is an a priori argument, the
Ontological Argument tries to prove the existence of God by
establishing the necessity of God’s existence through an
explanation of the concept of existence or necessary being.



There are those who would argue that the ontological argument
can certainly prove belief in God, as Anselm offers an a priori
deductive argument based on the logical impossibility of a
contradiction, thus proving God's existence from his definition
as “that which nothing greater can be conceived”



A priori deductive argument based on reason - moves from the
premise of God's existing nature to explanation, working off
reasoned logic which claims a contradiction is impossible.
This is shown in the quote “The fool says in his heart ‘There is
no God’“The fool contradicts himself, as God, by very definition,
is “something which nothing greater can be thought” An atheist
understands this as much as a theist. Due to the fact that God
can be perceived in the mind by the ‘fool’, yet reality is much
greater than thought, God must exist in reality, else he would
not fit with his definition as that which nothing greater can be
conceived, or TWNGCBC, the fool says what he says because
he has not understood his thought to a high enough degree.



On the other hand, Gainilo poses an argument ‘On behalf of the
fool’ possible to construct an argument with exactly the same
internal logic that purports to prove the existence of a perfect
island: one could imagine a perfect island thus it must exist as
reality is more perfect than imagination anything we imagine
as perfect has to exist, so therefore, one could argue that God
cannot be proven ontologically.

, However, Gaunilo’s criticism is flawed, as perfect islands are
not definable in the way God is. Platinga explained that a
perfect island is not comparable to God. God is different and
not contingent. Unlike an island, God is a necessary being,
therefore demonstrating that God can still be justified
ontologically.



God however is a subjective concept and cannot be defended
against in utilising terms like necessary; TWNGCBC is not the
only definition of God - the ancient Greeks considered God to
be the world, many religions are polytheistic. Equally others
may argue that the argument justifies belief in God as it
highlights God as a necessary being, with existence being a
defining predicate.



Descartes, explains existence is a predicate of perfection like
three sides is a predicate of a triangle. God, a, “supremely
perfect being” must exist, as existence is fundamental to his
nature. Furthermore, Necessary beings are greater than
contingent beings thus God must be necessary, as if he were
contingent he would not be the greatest conceivable being. If
he is necessary then he cannot not exist. The character of
God's existence has a special truth which is not available to any
other being. Therefore, according to religious believers, God
must exist as otherwise he would not be the greatest
conceivable being, so therefore, one could argue that God
could be argued ontologically. “Anything else does not exist so
truly and therefore has less being.”



Kant was notorious for using merely circular logic which cannot
be falsified “I could say that if I accepted God existed, then he
would necessarily exist, but I do not believe in him or his

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smax403. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart