PEARSON (PEARSON) • Religious Studies 2016
Latest uploads for Religious Studies 2016 at PEARSON (PEARSON). Looking for Religious Studies 2016 notes at PEARSON (PEARSON)? We have lots of notes, study guides and revision notes available for Religious Studies 2016 at PEARSON (PEARSON).
-
113
-
4
-
22
Modules Religious Studies 2016 at PEARSON (PEARSON)
Notes available for the following courses of Religious Studies 2016 at PEARSON (PEARSON)
- Unit 1 - Philosophical issues and questions 13
- Unit 10 - Ethical language 8RS0 7
- Unit 11 - Deontology, Virtue Ethics and the works of scholars 8RS0 6
- Unit 12 - Medical ethics: beginning and end of life issues 8RS0 3
- Unit 13 - Social, historical and religious context of the New Testament 9RSO03 4
- Unit 14 - Interpreting the text and issues of relationship, purpose and authorship 9RS0 3
- Unit 15 - Ways of interpreting the scripture 9RS0 1
- Unit 16 - Texts and interpretation: the Kingdom of God, conflict, the death and resurrection of Jesus 9RS0 3
- Unit 17 - Scientific and historicalcritical challenges, ethical living and the works of scholars 9RS0 2
- Unit 18 - Religious beliefs, values and teachings 1
- Unit 2 - The nature and influence of religious experience 6
- Unit 25 - Christianity 9RS0 3
- Unit 27 - Islam 6
- Unit 3 - Problems of evil and suffering 5
- Unit 4 - Religious language 12
- Unit 5 - Works of scholars 3
- Unit 6 - Influences of developments in religious belief 5
- Unit 7 - Significant concepts in issues or debates in religion and ethics 8RS0 4
- Unit 8 - A study of three ethical theories 8RS0 10
- Unit 9 - Application of ethical theories to issues of importance 8RS0 4
Popular books PEARSON (PEARSON) • Religious Studies 2016
Latest notes & summaries PEARSON (PEARSON) • Religious Studies 2016
This essay covers unit 4.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Analogy - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. This essay includes exploring verification and falsification to argue religious language is meaningless, examining ideas of A J Ayer and A Flew. Evaluations include ideas from other key scholars such as Hick and Hare, and the essay ends with a conclusion...
This essay covers unit 4.1 (b) of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Symbol - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores different ways symbols are used in the context of religious language, which is then followed by evaluations of symbols and religious language as a whole. The essay involves various key scholars' thoughts and ideas...
This essay covers unit 4.1 (a) of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - Analogy - in unit 4 Religious Language. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate of religious language, before exploring different forms of analogous language, such as Via Negativa and Aquinas' analogy of proportion and attribution. The essay has different evaluations of analogous ...
This essay covers unit 3 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Problems of Evil and Suffering. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay defines the debate in unit 3.2, such as by explaining the inconsistent triad and the different types of evil. The essay then moves to 3.2 by exploring each solution to the problem of evil such as the soul-deciding theodicy (3.2 (a))...
This essay covers unit 2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the nature and influence of religious experience. It can be used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions. The first part of the essay explores the nature, shown in unit 2.1, such as the different types of religious experiences as well as descriptions of them. The essay then moves on to unit 2.2 (a) through examining the influence of the experiences, such as ...
This essay covers unit 1.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Ontological argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.3 (a), such as explanations into a priori arguments, deductive reasoning and analytic propositions. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument, based on different definitions of God, show...
This essay covers unit 1.2 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Cosmological argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.2 (a), such as explanations into inductive reasoning and a posteriori arguments. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument shown in 1.2 (b), such as the Principle of Sufficient Reason, ...
This essay covers unit 1.1 of the Edexcel Religious Studies specification - the Design argument. It is used in Section C of Paper 1 (Question 4), includes a synoptic link, and can be tailored to earlier questions of the paper. The first part of the essay explores the debate shown in 1.1 (a), such as explanations into inductive reasoning and a posteriori arguments. The essay then begins to examine different types of the argument shown in 1.1 (b), such as analogy and the anthropic principle, and r...
In depth well written essays on the topic of Ethical Egoism with reference to Many philosophers such as Max Stirner and criticisms include philsophers such as rachels. There is exemplar answers for explaining ethical egoism and the challanges and a 30 marker where you are arguing for and agaisnt. Marked by teachers and given A*.
Includes 2 20 markers both explaining and challanges as 30 marker. Marked by my teachers and graded A* 20/20 29/30. Well structured and detailed.