Tonireid28

This is a document including the original extract the question was taken from, as well as a model answer, which received 9/10 marks when assessed and was graded an A*. Since marking, the answer has been amended to include recommendations for improvement. The task was to assess how convincing the historians interpretation of the nature of Tudor rule 1541 to 1563 is. The overarching argument of the model answer argues that it is largely convincing when compared to historical context. The reigns of...

This is an empirical essay written as a part of the Cambridge Caius Explore competition. This essay won the competition. The essay outlines a plan to research the impact on the presence of dogs on mental health in humans, assessed through DASS-21 scores and observations. The essay outlines the studies strengths and weaknesses, and introduces the university level structure of empirical research to the reader. The essay includes references to previous research and outlines expected results.

25 mark history essay titled "Was Elizabeth's foreign policy weak and unconvincing". This essay achieved 23 out of 25, with feedback given to improve speed in which it was written, and the content of the conclusion. The essay explores Elizabeth's foreign policy in regard to Spain, the Netherlands, France, and Scotland, and assesses whether Elizabeth met the aims of her foreign policy. The essay argues that Elizabeth's foreign policy was not weak and unconvincing.