100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
M1 €6,62
In winkelwagen

Essay

M1

3 beoordelingen
 3 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

This is my Unit 2 M1 work which I had completed in the year 2015/ 2016, it is a well detailed and thorough piece of work which has been marked and passed by my teacher Enjoy!!

Voorbeeld 1 van de 5  pagina's

  • 23 juni 2016
  • 5
  • 2015/2016
  • Essay
  • Onbekend
  • Merit

3  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: stardustfals • 5 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: sgctang1 • 6 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: Zhuojunzhang • 6 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
Bushra Khanom M1


Laws made by parliament (Act of Parliament)

Laws in this case can be made very quickly as long as the government is supporting the law
making. An example of this includes the Election Act 2001 where it was postponed due to
the foot and mouth disease which had effected a lot of people, this is why it had only taken
8 days to gain royal assent. Altering a law can be completed very quickly for the parliament
to be doing it, an example of this is that it only took 2 weeks for the parliament to go
through the statutory instrument with the act of Dangerous Dogs Act as the parliament
wanted to add two other types of breed of dogs into the list of banned dogs, but when this
came into act the statutory act was into force. However, laws made by judges is time
consuming as the laws would need to go through the whole court hierarchies. But on the
other hand not every type of law is made very quickly by the parliament, this is because
they would have to go through every single legislative stages a bill had to go through and
this could take up to a year or more of doing so that it is able to become an act of
parliament. Whereas, as the royal is a stage, a stage cannot argue, this is why other
individuals would argue, but this type of law making is funded by the public itself through
the form of tax payers, this is so that the problem is shared. This shows that laws are made
quicker in the parliament rather than with judges as the parliament would only need
support the law whereas judges have a longer process to go through to make new laws.

MP’s do not need to have any sort of legal qualification an example in this case is Louise
Mensch, who was an author before she had become an MP, but now she has retired.
Individuals who wish to be an MP need to be over the age of 18 and a British citizen or a
citizen who is a part of a commonwealth county or in the republic of Ireland. Applicants
must be selected by 10 members of the parliamentary electors on whom they wish to join
with, this is so that they are able to reassure that only hardworking candidates can stand.
But a price of £500 is required when anyone submits a nominated paper. But on the other
hand a judge would need to go through a long process as they would have to practice as a
solicitor or a barrister for at least 10 years before they can become a judge, this shows that
being part of a parliament is quicker than being judge.

The background of any MP’s are mainly middle aged white males, but these statistics show
that out of 650 MP’s only a small percentage of 23% of them are females, which is 148. This
shows that the background of an MP is similar to the background of a judge. Also only 27 of
them have a BME background which is 4%. The youngest MP is 29 but the average age of an
MP is 50.

Bills are firstly introduced to the Parliament; this is before any sorts of draft laws. There is
regular discussion and consultations being held with any parties who are interested in this,
parties include any professional bodies or pressure groups and also any sorts of voluntary
organisations. The different types of people that Michael Gove comments from are
individuals who want to reform their maths and English GCSE’s, or who were head teachers,
local authorities, employer of the business sector, subject associations such as awarding

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper bushra123. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,62. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 76813 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Laatst bekeken door jou


€6,62  3x  verkocht
  • (3)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd