100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Notes week 10 €5,49
In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Notes week 10

 28 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Complete notes of the lectures in week 10.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 5  pagina's

  • 6 januari 2020
  • 5
  • 2017/2018
  • College aantekeningen
  • Onbekend
  • Alle colleges
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alles voor dit studieboek (15)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (28)
avatar-seller
merelstammes
Hoorcollege 10 – 29-11-2017
Chapter 17 – Processes and Models of Media Effects

The premise of media effect: all theories assume that there is some kind of effect. Media
have effect, but what is the nature and the extent of the assumed effects?

Four phases in history of media effect research:
1. All-powerful media
a. Started after WW1  more attention
b. Before WW1  campaigning for war (people wanted war in some kind of
way) and patriotic messages
c. Hypodermic needle (inject someone with messages/opinions and people
change their mind)/magic bullet theories
d. Presumed that audience is not active
e. Propaganda: one-sided, biased and unobjective communication.  important
theoretical concept.
f. Political and military leaders try to have influence the media landscape, try to
own it.
g. All powerful media paradigm: relation between propaganda/mass media and
effects.
i.  trying to understand how persuasion through mass communication
works.
ii.  around this time many communication universities appeared.
iii.  commercial side also important: trying to find what media to use to
reach the target group.
h. Surveys were developed in this era.
 Short term
 Immediate
 Focus on change
 Uniform among the audience
 Hypodermic Needle theory / Magic Bullet Theory

1938: fake news Orson Welles. There was nothing wrong, but people thought that the united
states was under attack by Martians. People believed it because it was on the radio. 
shows how powerful media is/was.

2. Powerful media put to the test
a. 1930s – 1960s
b. Minimal effects
c. Too much variables  Many different variables that influence people
d. Berelson – opponent of the all-powerful media paradigm, he believes in
minimal effects.
e. People are much more critical than all-powerful thought  people make up
their own minds
f. Inoculation theory: we are bombarded with messages each day, we are able
to block certain messages and filter out important messages.
g. Two-step flow: opinion leaders tell other people what they think.

, h. Minimal effects theory: effects were over-estimated.  Media have effect but
reinforcement effects.
 Effects are over-estimated
 Minimal effects theory
 Opinion leader

3. Powerful media rediscovered
a. 1950s –
b. Evidence of the influence of television
c. Exposure correlates with influence
d. Discussion of WW2 influence
e. Two important reasons:
i. Influence of WW2  Hitler and propaganda etc.
ii. New media like television caused debate  huge power over
audiences.
f. More nuance: also
i. long-term effects  repeatedly being exposed to the same television
show for example.  but difficult to discover/study. What caused this
effect? Can be different factors that can change over time.
ii. Indirect effects
iii. Personal effects
iv. Reinforcement
g. Commission of the freedom of the press (1947): watchdog + fourth estate 
how could media check the government  social responsibility model: media
landscape needed guidelines, no complete freedom. Based on social
responsibility and not on freedom.
h. Government interference in extreme cases
i. The media should govern themselves (code of ethics)
j. Dominant model in many countries

4. Negotiated media influence
a. 1970s –
b. Social constructionism
c. Spiral of silence (Neuman): created by German scholar looking at WW2.
During WW2, many people disagreed with Hitler, but they were afraid to
speak out because of punishment etc. but also of Social Isolation. No one
dares to speak out  people are afraid that they are the only one with that
opinion.
d. People choose to be influenced  people choose to use which kind of media
e. Qualitative approach to study these topics but it is very difficult.
f. How to use media to find our place in the world
g. Philosophical era
h. Cultural communication is pre-dominant

Lazersfeld et al: some media have some kind of effect on some people in some times 
some communication can have some kind of effect.
Alternative models of effect:

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper merelstammes. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 54879 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€5,49
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd