Samenvatting
Summary LIO HC 6
- Instelling
- Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
Learning in organizations lecture 6 / hoorcollege 6 notes and summary articles
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Lecture 6 LIOThe Dark Side of Learning
10-10-19
The second article of Crowdley is not part of the exam.
Against the learning imperative
- Not wanting to learn is seen as stupid
- Resistance have to be overcome. Does it have to be?
Get smart?
• ‘Smartness’ is seen as a defining feature of modern organizations
• Doing business is no longer about the use of natural resources / production of products but
the ability to ‘know’
o Managing/developing the organization’s cognitive abilities is seen as essential to its
survival/success
This does not mean production is irrelevant! It simply acknowledges that
production and its associated activities are driven by knowledge
Or not?
• Those who have first-hand knowledge of organizations know that this is not necessarily true/
smart/intelligence
• Organizations are messy entities, do things that might be perceived of irrational, engage in
behaviour that can (and does) often defy logic, things are done for no good reason
• The aim is to direct attention towards the importance of other dimensions for the
effectiveness of organizations
o Enter functional stupidity
Functionally stupid?
• Functional stupidity can be seen as the systemic absence of (1) reflexivity, (2) substantive
reasoning and (3) justification
o Systemic: people do things continuously
• It is not the absence of intelligent action but its confinement to a subject that is limited in
scope and unproblematic (It won’t get anyone upset)
• Being ‘functionally stupid’ allows one to ignore situations that could spark uncertainty and
insecurity because one does not doubt the status quo
o One knows what to expect and what expectations need to be met in order to
succeed in one’s job
o They ignore problematic situations, because it could cause anxiety, which is not
desirable. It is not about being irrational, it’s about using your rationality in a very
specific topic of set of interests.
Functional stupidity
(1) A lack of reflexivity means the current organizational beliefs and practices (rules, routines and so
on) are taken for granted, seen as self-evident
• They are exempt from scrutiny! You do not question them.
• E.g. you are so familiar to a culture (the way how we decide to structure for instance a
course/lecture) that you do not question the culture although you might not like everything.
• People do not question their organization, because it is perceived as natural.
• It looks the same as justification: what is the explicit distinctions?
o About the rules vs what we choose to do
, (2) A lack of justification means that actions taken and choices made are not questioned
• No explanations are required, asked for or given
• There is no dialogue concerning why one does the things one does, no possibility for the
emergence of ‘weak signals’ no innovation.
• It’s about behaviour which is not questioned. It’s not asked for and not given.
• E.g. when two organizations are merged, other companies also merge to keep on with the
competition.
(3) A lack of substantive reasoning means that any intelligent action is focused on a limited number
of concerns prescribed by where you focus you intelligence/rational behaviour on (a small set of
concerts)
• The organization
• The profession (Lawyers need to defend mafia guys, but they feel threatened and want more
protection. Why actually defend such a criminal? You can’t question yourself)
• The work itself
o It results in bringing about, as efficiently as possible, a well-defined outcome that is
not questioned by those involved
o A valid question about internationalization: should we use the English language?
What is asked is about the second level problems. Not the core question!
o People might be afraid to ask such questions, defined as functional stupid.
These three dimensions each highlight a specific aspect of the same underlying issue
• There is also an affective dimension to FS next to above cognitive dimension:
o Motivation
o Emotion (this one is especially important)
Put differently: any use of ‘intelligent reflection’ by an organization’s
members is limited to the confines of the established framework, practices,
structures and so on.
A different way to look at incremental change.
• FS is brought about by that fact that we live in a society where organizations make extensive
use of symbolic communication in their dealings with consumers as well as employees
o E.g. the symbols behind Coca Cola, Nike, etc. these symbols/identities are also
visible in organizations.
o Creates robust corporate cultures, identities and reputations
o Delineates desired and desirable outcomes, expectations to be met
Influences practice (clearly present in the Pixar case)
How many hours you can work (no lock on the laboratory).
FS: What it does
• FS creates certainty; in doing so, one does not have to worry about the things you do on a
daily basis
o There is a shared understanding/belief that the different aspects of organizational
life are operating effectively and efficiently for the customers and the employees.
o The world will be there tomorrow in the same way, e.g. job certainty
• The message here is that we need a certain level of intentional ‘ignorance’ to ensure
organizations can operate smoothly from one day to the next
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper geer94. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67096 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen