100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Exam (elaborations) (16 mark) Eating - Psychological Explanations for Obesity- AQA Psychology for A Level Year 2 Student £4.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Exam (elaborations) (16 mark) Eating - Psychological Explanations for Obesity- AQA Psychology for A Level Year 2 Student

 75 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • AQA

This is a document with a 16 mark question. It has A03 AND A01 in a structural order and was awarded a grade A with nearly full marks. It explains the psychological factors that affect obesity.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • August 30, 2021
  • 2
  • 2016/2017
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (11)
avatar-seller
mayasultana
Outline and Evaluate the Psychological explanations for obesity

The psychological explanation was first connected through second world war soldiers, put on a
restricted diet. This made them want the food more and more as they are denied it. The
psychological explanation for obesity assumes that by resurrecting the diet from food it causes
an alter in the cognitive mind and causes people to overeat. This is supported with the main
idea of the restraint theory, where eaters create a strict diet between what's good and bad.
There is an unbalance in their ginger and full level, due to the limits of food, when they do
receive it, they fill themselves up to the full extent. Disinhibition provides an example of media
imagery and cognitive control. For example, If a group were to be shown imagery of food, when
they’re eating they consume more, and continue to consume after having no self-limitation. This
all plays into the role of The Boundary Model which explains the satiety state as well as the
aversive too, depending on motivation to eat. Ultimately, causing the ‘What the hell’ effect when
they break their limit.

One strength of the psychological explanation would be that there is supporting research. Jane
Wardle and Sally Beales (1988) randomly allocated 27 obese women into 3 groups. The diet
group followed a restrained eating diet for 7 weeks. The exercise group followed an exercise
regime but did not control their eating and the control participants received treatment. The
restrained eaters consumed the most calories out of everyone, they experienced disinhibition of
their eating when they would binge being full. Therefore, these would be a strength as it shows
the outcomes of disinhibition and restrained theory. It was a causal factor of overeating that led
to weight gain and obesity.

Another strength of the theory is the effects of media that support disinhibiting. For example,
Boyce and Kuijer 2014 compared the responses of restrained and unrestrained eaters to media
images. They showed participant slide downs that constrain images of thinness. Control
participants were shown furniture. After showing the images the participants' food intake was
measured by a 10 min taste test. They were allowed to eat as much as they’re like. The results
show the significant difference in restrained eaters and therefore, conclude that the media of
images on thinness does lead to eating which provides a path to gain weight and obesity.

However, a Limitation for this explanation would hold contradictory research findings. Jennifer
Savage et al 2009 carried out one of the few longitudinal studies into restrained eating. They
measured dietary restraint and disinhibition in 163 women at the start and every two years
afterwards over a 6-year period. They measured changes in the women's weight. They found
that increases in restrained eating were linked to decreases in weight (a significant negative
correlation). The researchers conclude that restrained eaters whilst dieting lead to weight loss
rather than weight gain, an outcome in the opposite of the theory. Therefore, this would limit the
validity of the psychological explanations for obesity.

On the other hand, one strength of the explanation is that practical applications are evidenced
within the boundary model. This predicts that food intake is consciously limited, the paradoxical

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mayasultana. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart