100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary AQA A-level Psychology: Forensic Psychology - 16 marker essay plans for all topics £6.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary AQA A-level Psychology: Forensic Psychology - 16 marker essay plans for all topics

1 review
 1108 views  14 purchases

A detailed yet concise essay plan for a 16 marker on all topics included in the Forensic Psychology module. This plan includes a fully detailed AO1 and AO3, with strong evaluation points for both for and against arguments. Information has been used from the AQA Psychology textbook to ensure that ea...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 24  pages

  • No
  • Forensic psychology
  • January 23, 2022
  • 24
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (156)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: Liah1357 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
zahrashahid16
OFFENDER PROFILING: THE TOP-DOWN APPROACH


DESCRIPTION (AO1)
 Offender profiling is a method of helping to identify the perpetrator of a crime based on the
nature of the offence and the manner in which it is committed. The main aim is to narrow list of
suspects.
 This is done by professional profilers and the police, who use evidence and the crime scene to
generate hypotheses about the characteristics of the offender, such as their age, occupation etc.
 The top-down approach originates in the USA and as created when the FBI interviewed 36
murderers and used this data, together with characteristics of their crimes, to create two categories
(organised and disorganised). If the data from a crime scene matched some of the characteristics of
one category we could predict other characteristics that would be likely.
ORGANISED AND DISORGANISED TYPES:
 These distinctions are based on the idea that offenders have certain signature ‘ways of working’.
 These generally correlate with a particular set of social and psychological characteristics that relate
to the individual.

ORGANISED DISORGANISED
Evidence of planning the crime – victim Little evidence of planning, suggesting the offence
deliberately targeted and the killer/rapist may may have been spontaneous.
have a ‘type’ of victim.
High degree of control during the crime and little The crime scene reflects the impulsive nature of
evidence left behind at the scene. the act e.g. body still at the scene and the crime
shows little control on the part of the offender.
Above-average IQ – in a skilled/professional job Below-average IQ – may be in unskilled work or
unemployed.
Usually married and may even have children. A history of failed relationships and living alone,
possible history of sexual dysfunction.


FBI PROFILE CONSTRUCTION:
1. DATA ASSIMILATION – review of the evidence (photos, forensic evidence, police reports etc.)

2. CRIME SCENE CLASSIFICATION – organised or disorganised

3. CRIME RECONSTRUCTION – generation of a hypotheses about what happened (the behaviour and
events).

4. PROFILE GENERATION – generation of hypotheses about the offender (background, physical
characteristics, etc.)

, EVALUATION OF OFFENDER PROFILING: THE TOP-DOWN APPROACH (AO3)


STRENGTHS
THERE IS RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR AN ORGANISED CATEGORY
 Canter et al. looked at 100 US serial killers. Smallest space analysis was used to examine the details
of each case with reference to 39 characteristics thought to be typical of organised and
disorganised killers.
 This analysis revealed a subset of behaviours of many serial killings which match the FBIs typology
for organised offenders.
 This suggests that a key component of the FBI typology approach has some validity.
POLICE WHO HAVE USED FBI METHODS BELIEVE IT IS USEFUL
 Copson questioned 184 US police officers and 84% said the technique was operationally useful and
over 90% said they would use it again.
 The technique may not result in an actual identification of the offender, but Scherer and Jarvis
defend the use of top-down processing by looking at other professional contributions beyond the
identification of the offender.
 For example, the approach offers investigators a different perspective, opens up new avenues for
investigation and may prevent wrongful conviction.

LIMITATIONS
EVIDENCE FOR TOP-DOWN PROFILING WAS FLAWED
 Canter et al. argues that the FBI agents didn’t select a random or large enough sample, nor did it
include different kinds of offenders.
 There was no standard set of questions so each interview was different and therefore not really
comparable.
 This suggests that top-down profiling doesn’t have a sound scientific basis.
IT’S ONLY APPROPRIATE FOR CERTAIN CRIMES
 Top-down profiling works well for serial murders, cult killings and arson attacks where a person’s
personality might be apparent from the crime scene.
 But it is unlikely to be useful for something like a burglary or a single murder where a person’s
personality is unlikely to be obvious.
MAY NOT ALWAYS LEAD TO SUCCESSFUL IDENTIFICATION
 Top-down approach is based on behavioural consistency – that serial offenders have characteristics
ways of working so crime scene characteristics helps identification.
 Mischel argued that people’s behaviour is much more driven by the situation they’re in rather than
‘personality’.
 This suggests that a profiling method based on behavioural consistency may not always lead to
successful identification of an offender.

, OFFENDER PROFILING: THE BOTTOM-UP APPROACH


DESCRIPTION (AO1)
 Developed in the UK by David Canter and aims to generate a profile of the offenders’
characteristics, routines and background by looking at the available evidence.
 Starts with small details and creates the big picture. No initial assumptions are made about the
offender and the approach relies heavily on computer databases (data-driven approach).
 It can be the little details that are often overlooked that can be crucial to the success of a case.
 There are no fixed typologies (as in the US system) that will be attempted to be matched to the
offender. Instead, a profile should emerge solely from the evidence of each case.
INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY – AN EXAMPLE OF THE BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
 Aim is to establish patterns of behaviour that are likely to occur or co-exist across crime scenes.
 This is in order to develop a statistical ‘database’ which then acts as a baseline for comparison.
 Specific details of an offence, or related offences, can then be matched against this database to
reveal important details about the offender, their personal history, social background etc.
 This may also determine whether a series of crimes are linked in that they’re likely to be committed
by the same person.
 A central concept is interpersonal coherence – the way an offender behaves at the scene
(including how they interact with the victim) may reflect their behaviour in everyday situations (e.g.
controlling, apologetic etc.).
GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING
 Geographical profiling uses information to do with the location of linked crime scenes to make
inferences about the likely home or operational base of an offender – known as crime mapping.
 Serial offenders will restrict their ‘work’ to areas they are familiar with, so an understanding of the
spatial pattern of their behaviour provides investigators with a centre of gravity which is likely to
include the offender’s base.
 Location can be used alongside psychological theory to create hypotheses about the offender.
Canter’s circle theory proposed two models of offender behaviour:
 THE MARAUDER – who operates in close proximity to their home base.
 THE COMMUTER – who is likely to have travelled to commit the crime.


The pattern of offending is likely to form a circle around their usual residence, and this becomes more
apparent the more offences there are. This can offer the investigative team important insight into the
nature of the offence and characteristics of the offender.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zahrashahid16. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£6.99  14x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart