This document provides detailed A01 notes and A03 evaluation into psychological explanations for obesity of the eating behaviours module, these notes are clear, and easy to follow. The A03 contains a deep explanation of both strengths and limitations to the theory/study, along with evidential sup...
Psychological explanations for obesity; Restraint theory, disinhibition, boundary model
Overview: A cognitive explanation which argues that obesity is the paradoxical outcome of attempts
to restrain eating/attempt to diet.
Restraint theory: Herman & Polivy (1975) argues that restrained eating is self-defeating, those that
aim to restrain often fail or even eat more than if they didn’t restrain themselves.
Cognitive control: Set strict limits. Set food into ‘good or bad’, some foods are ‘forbidden’,
restrained eaters believe this is a key control to lose weight. The eater is consciously
assessing food choices all the time (hence cognitive)
Paradoxical outcome: This restriction leads to a contradiction, that the person becomes
more preoccupied with food rather than less. The limits mean they ignore physiological
indicators of hunger and satiety, this leads to disinhibition.
Disinhibition: A period of restrained eating usually follows by the person eating whatever they want.
Internal and external food related cues such as mood, smells or media images are called
disinhibitors and they cause the person to lose control of their restrained eating. A cognitive process
called ‘all or nothing thinking’ promotes disinhibition “I’ve started eating it, now I may as well finish
it”.
The boundary model: (As shown in diagram below)
Food intake exists on a continuum from hunger to satiety (feeling full). Biological processes
determine how much we eat based on this continuum, feeling an aversive hunger motivates us to
eat, likewise eating until reaching an aversive satiety will create discomfort and motivates us to stop
eating. Between these states is the ‘zone of biological indifference’, where cognitive and social
factors have greater influence on food intake. (homeostasis)
Restrained eaters: have lower hunger boundary so less responsive to hunger, higher satiety
boundary so needs more food to feel full. Their zone of biological indifference is therefore wider,
meaning food intake comes down to cognitive control (rather than physiological) and makes
disinhibition more likely.
Normal eater
Aversion Aversion
Zone of biological indifference
Satiety
Hunger
Increased food intake
Aversion Aversion
Hunger Zone of biological indifference Satiety
Restrained eater
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller benjamincatling. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
