100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Public Law LL106 - Heads of Judicial Review £4.49
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Public Law LL106 - Heads of Judicial Review

 120 views  0 purchase

These notes are a complete collection of my lecture notes, reading, and extra investigation into the the particular topic. They are fully structured, and have a contents page at the very top, in order to ensure that the ideas and arguments within are easy to navigate. At certain points, I have a...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 23  pages

  • June 19, 2017
  • 23
  • 2016/2017
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (15)
avatar-seller
TGT
Public Law (LL106) - Heads of Judicial Review

Contents
1. The Grounds of JR - an Introduction
2. Illegality
2.1. The General Principle: The delegation of powers that have already been delegated is not
permitted
2.2. The Exceptions: delegation is permissible within local authorities or by Ministers to their
departments
2.3. Public Bodies that have discretionary powers may to fall afoul of their duties if they consider
themselves to be bound by others’ views
2.4. Failures to apply discretion:
2.5. Limitations to the use of discretion
3. Irrationality
3.1. Diplock’s definition
3.2. Criticism of Wednesbury unreasonableness
3.3. The ‘sliding scale’
3.4. Anxious Scrutiny
3.5. Criticism of Anxious Scrutiny
4. Proportionality
4.1. Balancing act
4.2. Not native to the common law
4.3. Widely used in EU matters
4.4. Difference between Proportionality and Irrationality
5. Procedural Impropriety
5.1. Definition
5.2. Meaning of ‘fairness’
5.3. When is it to be used?
5.4. Cases involving procedural fairness
5.5. Is procedural fairness the same as substantive justice?
6. Trends in the development of the Heads of JR
6.1. Formalist vs Substantivist review
6.2. The shift towards substantive review - anxious scrutiny and the HRA 1998
6.3. The move from Wednesbury irrationality to Proportionality
6.4. Substantive fairness is taking precedence over procedural fairness
7. Case Notes - Judicial Review

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TGT. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added