This is a summary note of Ac3.1, Examine Information for Validity . These notes helped me receive an A* overall; friends and family who borrowed these notes have received high grades. It is quickly allied with titles and detailed explanations that are easy to understand. The notes were written thro...
Barry George Sion Jenkins Sally Clarke Hillsborough
Did Barry do it? Did Sion do it? Was everything valid? Who is guilty fans or police
The spattering, which Advised by the court Called the ‘Taylor’
Law reports was not readily that she had another report. Failure of
visible, was similar to lawyer represent stadium was cos of
fine spray which was herself as this would lack of police control
observed on the front make it unbiased and yet David Duckenfield
of the leggings worn valid. was not found guilty.
by the deceased, and When the ambulance – showed lack of
neither Denise arrived, she was accuracy
Franklin nor the unable to unlock the
ambulance crew door and was
paramedics had hysterical and in
clothing which was shock.
similarly affected.
There was blood on
the shoes of one of
the paramedics, but
that was all. The
nature and
distribution of the
blood spattering on
the clothing worn by
the appellant was
consistent with him
being the attacker.
her father said to her:
"we'll be alright; we
were together
weren't we, A?"
, Demonstrated photos Suggested there was Reported sally to be
Media in balaclavas an imprint of Sions depressed and drunk
Photos of him shoes on Billie’s in her pregnancy's -
pretending to be SAS cheeks – Bias bias
trooper ‘My husband the
The Mirro: ‘Jills mad murderer’ - implies
assassin’ front cover of guilt
George with gun and a ‘Father of your
mask. Subheadings children, is capable of
(‘jailed for rape attack, murdering your child’
stalked 419, wife tells - close relations
of violent marriage’) distrust him
Bristol post “was Jill
killed by hitman's
mistake?” - misleading
and can cause bias
The sun
“Assassination”
On appeal it was Lied about his On 2 July 2002, the Took until 2016 to get
Judgements found that he qualifications on his CCRC concluded: "… a suitable charges of
wouldn’t be capable CV and had repeated that there is a real manslaughter –
due to his learning these lies to get his possibility that the shows accuracy in
difficulties head teacher job Court of Appeal will findings and
which was being find that the new evidence.
processed evidence renders Mrs
15 grounds for appeal Clark’s convictions for
the murders of
Christopher and
Harry unsafe."
Piece of gunshot in his 158 blood splatters Use of objective 4500 witness
Evidence coat pocket – accurate from Billie Jo on testing to confirm statements matched
Numerous clippings of Sion’s clothes – that the death could that suggested the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isabellajane12. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
