100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.4 Asses the key influence affecting the outcomes of the criminal cases £7.34   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.4 Asses the key influence affecting the outcomes of the criminal cases

 27 views  0 purchase

This is a summary note of Ac2.4,Asses the key influence affecting the outcomes of the criminal cases. These notes helped me receive an A* overall; friends and family who borrowed these notes have received high grades. It is quickly allied with titles and detailed explanations that are easy to under...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • Yes
  • August 28, 2024
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (372)
avatar-seller
isabellajane12
AC2.4


Asses the key influence affecting the outcomes of the criminal cases

Reliability of evidence

- Evidence is very important in criminal cases - physical and testimonial
- There has to be sufficient evidence before the CPS decide to charge a suspect
- Prosecution presents their evidence; the defence cross examines and presents their own
evidence.
- By the end of the trial the prosecution has to convince the jury/magistrates that the
defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt otherwise he must be acquitted.

Case Example - Colin Stagg

- Rachel Nickell was murdered in Wimbledon Common, with the only witness being her son
- The son, Alex, managed to give a description of the killer
- Criminal profiler, Paul Britton, was hired to help the investigation
- Colin Stagg was arrested for the murder but there was no evidence
- An undercover female police officer was used to try and trap Stagg into confessing
- He did not confess to the officer
- Robert Napper refused to give DNA evidence to the police
- Green Chain - series of rapes by Robert Napper
- Britton did not link the Green Chain
- Napper murdered a young mum and a daughter in their own home
- A fingerprint was found at the scene
- The case against Colin Stagg was thrown out of court
- Paint found in Alex’s hair patched the paint of Napper’s toolbox

Case Example - David Butler

- Mr Butler was accused of murdering a woman, Anne Marie Foy, in 2005.
- His DNA sample was on record after he had given it to them as part of an investigation into a
burglary.
- The DNA sample was only a partial match, of poor quality, and experts at the time said they
could neither say that he was guilty nor rule him out.
- He spent eight months in prison, on remand, facing murder charges. T
- he case eventually went to trial
- Mr Butler was acquitted and finally released, and nobody was ever charged with the murder.

Case Example - Anthony Diedrick

- Anthony Diedrick strangled a 27-year-old doctor who rejected him after their relationship
ended.
- Four years later he was charged with murder after forensic scientists uncovered three tiny
blood specks belonging to Diedrick on the collar of her pink T-shirt.

Case Example - Sally Clarke

- Sally Clarke was wrongly convicted of murdering her two baby sons. They had in fact died
from sudden infant death syndrome, but a professor told the jury that this was very unlikely
to be true based on probability.
- It was later found his research was incorrect.

, AC2.4

- This demonstrates how evidence that is incorrect can lead to miscarriages of justice.

Case Example - Stephen Downing

- Wendy Sewell was attacked, in Bakewell Cemetery, at lunchtime on 12 September 1973. A
witness, Charles Carman, saw her enter the cemetery at about 12:50 pm. She was beaten
around the head with the handle of a pickaxe and sexually assaulted
- Stephen Downing, who worked at the cemetery, was the person who found the body and
called the police.
- A forensic scientist Norman Lee gave evidence that the blood found on the accused could
only have been present if he had been responsible for the assault.
- This evidence led to him being found guilty
- He remained in prison for 27 years before his conviction was quashed

Witnesses

- Both prosecution and defence teams are entitled to call witnesses to give testimonial
evidence. This is given in person, unless they are vulnerable or intimidated witnesses
- Witnesses can be called by both sides to give evidence - this is called examination- in-chief.
There is also an opportunity to cross examine.
- Jurors and magistrates can give whatever weight they choose to the evidence of witnesses.
The quality of their evidence can determine the outcome of the trial eg. Have they been
shown to lie, is there evidence inconsistent, unreliable or not credible.
- Racial and gender stereotypes held by jurors may influence how likely the jury are to believe
a witness testimony
- In addition to this, Brodsky et al found that juror’s view of the witnesses knowledge and
factors like likeability influenced them in deciding whether to believe their evidence.

Case Example - Ronald Cotton

- In July 1984, a man broke into Jennifer Thompson-Cannino’s apartment and sexually
assaulted her.
- Ronald Cotton was arrested and charged based on the basis of Jennifer choosing Cotton out
of a photo lineup
- On June 30, 1995, Cotton was officially cleared of all charges and released from prison. In
July 1995, the governor of North Carolina officially pardoned Cotton. Cotton had served 10.5
years in prison.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isabellajane12. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.34
  • (0)
  Add to cart