Summary

Summary Jurisprudence - Unjust Laws

0 purchase

Module
Jurisprudence

Institution
Oxford University (OX)

Comprehensive summary/exam notes on the topic of unjust laws in Jurisprudence covering two key questions: whether unjust laws are still law, and whether we have an obligation to obey unjust laws. This document sets out differing views and includes in-depth analysis which can be used to structure an...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3 pages

View example

Uploaded on October 7, 2024
Number of pages 3
Written in 2022/2023
Type Summary

jurisprudence
theory of law
unjust laws
obligation to obey unjust laws

bethjscott5713 Member since 6 months 2 documents sold

£7.86

Also available in package deal from £20.53

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (2)

Jurisprudence Summary Bundle

£ 39.60 £ 20.53

1x sold

5 items

1. Summary - Jurisprudence - unjust laws
2. Summary - Jurisprudence- the rule of law
3. Summary - Jurisprudence - the rule of recognition
4. Summary - Jurisprudence - role of sanctions
5. Summary - Jurisprudence - moral purpose/point of law
Show more

Oxford University Law Summaries

£ 595.22 £ 250.48 72 items

1. Summary - Administrative law - bias, predetermination and article 6 summary
2. Summary - Administrative law - deference summary
3. Summary - Administrative law - judicial review and courts act 2022
4. Summary - Administrative law - legitimate expectations summary
5. Summary - Administrative law - oversight of policy summary
6. Summary - Administrative law - review of discretion summary
7. Summary - Administrative law - s.84 criminal justice and courts act 2015 summary
8. Summary - Administrative law - standing summary
9. Summary - Administrative law - statutory construction and fact-finding summary
10. Summary - Administrative law - tribunals summary
11. Summary - Contract law - agreement (foundations of contract) summary
12. Summary - Contract law - breaching terms of a contract summary
13. Summary - Contract law - consideration and estoppel summary
14. Summary - Contract law - frustration summary
15. Summary - Contract law - implied and express terms summary
16. Summary - Contract law - misrepresentation summary
17. Summary - Contract law - mistake summary
18. Summary - Contract law - third parties summary
19. Summary - Contract law - unequal bargaining power summary
20. Summary - Contract law - unfair contract terms summary
21. Summary - Contract law - unilateral contracts summary
22. Summary - European union law - conferral and subsidiarity
23. Summary - European union law - constitutional pluralism
24. Summary - European union law - democratic deficit
25. Summary - European union law - direct effect summary
26. Summary - European union law - free movement of goods summary/problem question structure
27. Summary - European law - horizontal direct effect of directives
28. Summary - European union law - liability of the union summary
29. Summary - European union law - national procedural autonomy and state liability summary
30. Summary - European union law - the principle underpinning free movement of goods
31. Summary - European union law - eu supremacy summary
32. Summary - Human rights law - article 5 (right to liberty)
33. Summary - Human rights law - article 6 (right to a fair trial) summary
34. Summary - Human rights law - margin of appreciation summary
35. Summary - Human rights law - extraterritoriality summary
36. Summary - Human rights law - common law rights vs echr rights
37. Summary - Human rights law - article 14 (freedom from discrimination)
38. Summary - Human rights law - article 10 (freedom of expression)
39. Summary - Human rights law - article 9 (freedom of religion) summary
40. Summary - Jurisprudence - unjust laws
41. Summary - Jurisprudence- the rule of law
42. Summary - Jurisprudence - the rule of recognition
43. Summary - Jurisprudence - role of sanctions
44. Summary - Jurisprudence - moral purpose/point of law
45. Summary - Land law - proprietary estoppel summary
46. Summary - Land law - leases and licenses summary/problem question structure
47. Summary - Land law - guest v guest
48. Summary - Land law - easements summary/problem question structure
49. Summary - Land law - covenants summary/problem question structure
50. Summary - Land law - co-ownership summary/problem question structure
51. Summary - Land law - actual occupation summary/cases
52. Summary - Tort law - vicarious liability and non-delegable duties summary/problem question stru...
53. Summary - Tort law - rylands v fletcher summary/problem question structure
54. Summary - Tort law - remoteness summary
55. Summary - Tort law - pure economic loss summary
56. Summary - Tort law - private nuisance summary/problem question structure
57. Summary - Tort law - occupier's liability summary/problem question structure
58. Summary - Tort law - duty of care summary (omissions and public authorities)
59. Summary - Tort law - defences summary
60. Summary - Tort law - defective products summary/problem question structure
61. Summary - Tort law - defective premises summary/problem question structure
62. Summary - Tort law - causation summary
63. Summary - Tort law - breach of duty summary
64. Summary - Trusts law - the three certainties summary/problem question structure
65. Summary - Trusts law - resulting trusts summary
66. Summary - Trusts law - quistclose trusts summary
67. Summary - Trusts law - the rule against private purpose trusts
68. Summary - Trusts law - personal liability of trustees summary
69. Summary - Trusts law - nature of the beneficiary's interest
70. Summary - Trusts law - knowing receipt
71. Summary - Trusts law - dispositions of equitable interests summary/problem question structure
72. Summary - Trusts law - constructive trusts summary
Show more

Unjust Laws
A key distinction needs to be drawn between legal validity and one’s moral obligation to obey the
law.
While unjust laws in any legal system should be recognised as “laws”, the extent to which a
citizen has a moral obligation to obey that law depends on how far the legal system
reasonably resolves coordination problems.
While disregarding unjust laws as laws may lead to anarchy, denying that there is no moral obligation
to obey them does not.
Just because there is no general obligation to obey a law, does not mean there is no
compliance. The two remain fundamentally different concepts.
“Unjust” = not based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair.”

Are unjust laws still law?
Traditional natural law perspective = No:
Aquinas and Augustine – lex inuesta non est lex (an unjust law is no law at all).
Any law that does not work to the benefit of the common good is by default no law at
all.
Common good is important but in relation to one’s moral obligation rather
than validity of the law itself – distinction should be drawn.
Updated natural law perspective = No:
Finnis – laws are subjective to the individual – one’s personal take on morality is how
laws can be interpreted.
In the case of unjust laws, one’s own morality prevails over the arbitrary laws
which claim to have authority.
Criticisms of this approach:
Rooted in religion – seems less relevant in a modern secular society.
Rests on the assumption that there is an objective moral standard which can be
discerned.
This theory suggests that a law will not be treated as valid unless it passes
some kind of moral threshold.
What are the moral requirements for a just law?
Would have to be entirely objective and would have to be a universal
consensus on the identity.
There is no consensus – can see this through Finnis’ identification of the 7
basic human goods: life, knowledge, sociability of friendship, play, aesthetic
experience, practical reasonableness, and religion.
He presents these as ‘self-evident’.
BUT – is really just concealing his own personal opinion of what
these values should encompass.
Especially religion – going back to point about modern secular
society – not everyone is religious and so for many people, religion
would not be considered a basic human good.
Risk of insufficiently distinguishing between what the law “is” and what the law
“ought to be”.
Exacerbated by Finnis’s approach – trying to make the traditional natural law
approach more palatable but actually just exacerbated the issues.
There is no consensus – everyone has their own view of moral values.
Risk of leading to anarchy – dismantle social order.
If everyone is entitled to disregard law entirely, consider it invalid,
on the basis of their own moral values – completely dismantle social
order.
Soft positivist view = Yes:
Hart – law is a question of social fact.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.