100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Complete summary lectures Credit, Complexity and Systemic Risk €6,39
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Complete summary lectures Credit, Complexity and Systemic Risk

2 beoordelingen
 138 keer bekeken  8 keer verkocht

This is a complete summary of all lectures of the course Credit, Complexity and Systemic Risk. This is a course which is part of the QFRM and Finance and Technology masters. I passed the course with a 8.8.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 45  pagina's

  • 26 maart 2021
  • 45
  • 2020/2021
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (1)

2  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: karim_bahr • 10 maanden geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: attilaivan2 • 10 maanden geleden

avatar-seller
Elmar1999
Week 1: Portfolio Credit Risk

Topic 1.2: Credit Risk Intro

Credit risk is the risk that changes in the credit quality of counterparties or issuers of securities affect
the value of the portfolios. It includes losses due to default and market losses due to deteriorating
credit quality.

Applications of credit risk models can roughly be split into two domains:

1. Pricing of credit risky securities such as corporate bonds, derivatives, credit default swaps.
2. Risk capital management: computation of loss distribution and associated risk measures such
as Expected Shortfall.

Managing credit risk is similar to other market risks, however there are some specific challenges such
as: lack of public information on credit quality, strongly skewed loss distributions with heavy tails
(leading to frequent small gains and occasional large losses) and the modelling of dependence is
crucial since the tail of the loss distribution is strongly influenced by default dependency
assumptions.



Topic 1.3: Merton’s Model

Merton’s model says that when a company cannot repay its debts (the current value of its assets is
lower than its liabilities), it will go into default. The specifications of the model are shown below:




In the model, we essentially have two cases at time T:




The model above also explains the conflicts of interest between shareholders and debtholders. In the
upside case shareholders receive a large profit and in the downside there is a maximum loss they can
incur. On the other hand, the debtholders do not receive large upside potential, while they are
exposed to losses. So it might be in the interest of the shareholders to make the firm more risky,
while the debtholders actually want to mitigate the risks of the firm as much as possible.

,The additional setup of the model is shown below and it shows us that with the assumptions made
(that asset values follow a log-normal distribution), we now enter the Black-Scholes world, in which
we can use the Black-Scholes formula to price the equity and debt of the firm (minus sign in default
probability formula should be an equals sign):




In the BS formula, when the volatility of the underlying goes up, the value of a put option on the
underlying goes up. Thus we can also see the relation between volatility and debt value in the
formula above. When the volatility of the asset value 𝑉𝑡 goes up, the debt value goes down.

When looking at the relationship between the credit spread and volatility and time to maturity, we
can state that: when the volatility is high, there is a higher probability that you default, thus the
credit spread goes up and when the time to maturity goes up, the credit spread also goes up. One
shortcoming of Merton’s model is that the credit spread at lower time to maturity is modelled too
low for what is often observed in real life.



Topic 1.4: Default Dependency

Default dependency concerns the case where there are multiple risk exposures that have
dependencies between them. The model used to analyse default dependencies is given below:




Consider first the case where defaults happen independently, in this case we are essentially flipping a
coin and what comes out determines for each firm if they default or not. In this case the loss
distribution of a portfolio of N loans is given by the Binomial distribution (which converges to a
normal distribution as the observations go up, due to the central limit theorem):

,This gives us the following distribution in the case of 100 exposures and a 5 percent individual default
probability:




We may observe that the tail of this distribution is rather small and thus does not really do justice to
the real-life distributions of defaults, which actually have larger tails. The small tail is due to the
default dependencies not being modelled.

A flip-side of the above case is that there is a situation of perfect dependency, in which case either all
the obligors default (with probability p = 5%) or none of the obligors default (with probability 1 - p =
95%).

The X% VaR gives the number of defaults/loss that will not be exceeded in X% of the cases. It is good
to note that the VaR may in some cases not be a very meaningful statistic of risk, given that it takes
the value of 100 for all levels above 95% (for example in the above case).

Essentially, in the end we would still like to model the cases between perfect independence and
perfect dependence, so with some level of default dependency, but not perfect dependency.

, Topic 1.5: One Factor Model

The one factor model combines the knowledge from Merton’s model, that a firm may default, with
the knowledge that there may be default dependencies. The model’s setup is shown below:




The addition that is made in the one factor model, to Merton’s model is that a covariance matrix is
used to account for the default dependencies. To setup the model we additionally need to do the
following as shown below. By taking the inverse of the Gaussian distribution (𝜙 −1 ) on both sides, we
may obtain the individual default probability (𝑑𝑖 ):




Additionally, as shown above, we need to calibrate the correlation parameters, but if there are many
exposures, this becomes a lot very quickly (as the formula shows). This thus often is avoided by
introducing a small set of common factors (and only calibrate the correlations for these common
factors). We may setup the one-factor model as such:




An example of the Y common factor may be the economic environment, since when there is a crisis
occurring, for example, this influences a lot of underlying companies. An idiosyncratic risk
component is also modelled in this model, with the 𝜖𝑖 .

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Elmar1999. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,39. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52510 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,39  8x  verkocht
  • (2)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd