College aantekeningen
Class notes Criminal Law
- Vak
- Criminal Law
- Instelling
- Tilburg University (UVT)
These are my class notes from Criminal Law in the year 2019 (semester 2). I passed this course with an 8.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Global Law Criminal Law (2018-2019, semester 2)Lecture 1: What is criminal law?
Substantive criminal law = field of law that determines which facts are criminal
Protects legal interests such as life
Also used as a form of governance to regulate minor wrongs
Mala in se v mala prohibita
Procedural criminal law = formal rules to enforce substantive criminal law
Contains rules that regulate: investigation (searches, witnesses interrogations), trial,
appeal
Who makes criminal law?
State/federal legislator
Lower legislators (municipalities)
Supranational intstitutions (EU)
Criminal courts (common law)
Main sources of criminal law
Criminal codes
Acts of parliament/congress
Case law
Doctrine
Criminal law is an ultimate remedy/last resort -- and must be proportionate
Criminal courts
a. lower courts
b. courts of appeal
c. supreme court
Functions of criminal law
Declaratory = values of society
Preventative = punishment may keep people from committing crime
Censuring = signalling certain behavior as wrong
Why punish
Retributive theory
- proportionality
- you committed a wrong, state can wrong you by punishing you
Utilitarian theory
- focus on future
- cannot inflict harm while in prison
- rehabilitation
Mixed theory: combination of deterrence and rehabilitation
Conditions for criminal liability
1. act (actus reus)
- certain age (criminal capacity)
- willed voluntary act
1
,- actus reus = legal definition of a criminal offense in a certain country
- omission may count when there is a duty to act
2. causation
- conditio sine qua non
- proximate cause
- adequation (foreseeable)
What factor is more important in contributing to the crime? More factors
but for- test
3. fault (mens rea)
= intentionally
4. wrongdoing (no justification)
e.g. necessity or self-defense
still harmful, but no longer considered wrong
5. blameworthiness (no excuse)
e.g. duress or involuntary intoxication
if there is a legal excuse, defendant is no longer blameworthy
Scope of criminal liability
- justification (act is not wrongful)
- excuse (actor not culpable)
Broadening criminal liability
- inchoate offenses (=just begun and so not fully formed or developed; rudimentary)
- complicity
Jurisdiction
- nationality, territoriality, universal
- territorial jurisdiction has priority --> sovereignty (includes vessels, airplanes ships)
Requirement of double criminality (is a crime in both jurisdictions)
If something is not a crime in a country, they cannot claim jurisdiction
2
, Lecture 2: Criminalization and decriminalization
Criteria act must be harmful AND wrong
POLITICS
Why?
- principle of legality
- criminal law is the most coercive state instrument
THEORIES OF CRIMINALIZATION
Utilitarian
= for the greater good
Law & economics
= cost/benefit analysis
Legal moralism
= criminalization of immoral conduct
HARM
- Prevent harm to others
o Individual autonomy
o Welfare, part of a community
- BALANCING ANALYSIS* : greater the gravity and likelihood of harm the strong the case in favour of
criminalisation (like terrorism), the more valuable conduct is , or the more prohibition woud limit
liberty the stonger the case against criminalisation ( so like since privacy violation is als harm)
Public wrongfulness : legal moralism theory
- a crime against one as a crime against all
- Can be controversial
comparison between criminal and civil law: criminal is only about PUBLIC wrongs so we get that civil
law is going to be more broad than criminal law
No objective criteria: criminalisation is a balancing act
- Harm and wrong are threshold criteria
Secondary (or moderating) criteria:
• Proportionality
- retrospective: punishment should fit the crime
- prospective response should fit the act (warrants a criminal law response?)
--> standard harm analysis*
• Subsidiarity
- criminal law last resort --> alternatives tort law, tax law
• Effectiveness
– Prosecutability
– Chance of detection & capacity of criminal justice system
– Deterrent effect
3
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper sissihuys. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 75759 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen