Samenvatting
Organizational Psychology (IBP), summary, very detailed
- Instelling
- Universiteit Leiden (UL)
Very detailed summary. No full sentences, but bullet points. Includes pictures and graphs for clarification. Version 2020
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 51 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 51 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
1Chapter 4: Perception, Attribution, and the Management of Diversity
Nature of Perception
perception = process by which individuals select, organize, and interpret the input from their senses
- perceiver = person trying to interpret something
- target of perception = thing the perceiver is trying to make sense of
- situation = context in which perception takes place
- perceptual process not always yield accurate perceptions (= perceptions as close as possible to
the true nature of the target of perception) → even when trying to be objective often biased
views → understanding of this = sign implications for understanding organizational behavior
- inaccurate perceptions: hurt employee and organization
Motivation and Performance
- managers need to make sure that subordinates are motivated to perform at high levels
- the more accurately managers perceive subordinates, the better able they are to motivate them
- accurate perceptions also help managers relate to each other and enable members at all levels to
work together to achieve organizational goals
Fairness and Equity
- in order to have an effective global workforce, all members of an organization need to be treated
fairly
- attracting and retaining a global workforce requires that employees’ capabilities & performances
are accurately perceived and that all employees are treated fairly, regardless of ethnicity &
gender
Ethical Action
- accurately perceiving diverse members of an organization and their abilities, skills and
performance levels is a legal requirement and ethical necessity
Characteristics of the Perceiver
Schemas: The Perceiver’s Knowledge Base
schema = an abstract knowledge
structure stored in memory that makes
possible the organization &
interpretation of info about a target of
perception
→ schemas determine how the target is perceived
- help interpret the world using past experiences and knowledge
- selecting sensory input consistent w/ existing schemas and discounting or ignoring
inconsistent input → reinforce and strengthen schemas → schemas are often resistant to
change but not immutable
, 2
- functionality of schemas: mostly functional for perceivers → act like filter for info that is
perceived important
→ can help learn about and adapt to complex environments (e.g. a firm)
→ can be dysfunctional when result in inaccurate perceptions + are often also dysfunctional
for target of perception
- stereotypes (example for dysfunctional schemas): stereotype = set of overly simplified and often
inaccurate beliefs about the typical characteristics of a particular groups
→ dysfunctional because: often based on inaccurate info → often individual is assigned to
stereotyped group only because they have one striking characteristic
→ cause discrimination in workplace and in general
→ think of it, act against w/ workshops etc.→ improve but still have to guard from
→ result: illegal to discriminate against people because of gender, race, and age → lawsuit
The Perceiver’s Motivational State
perceiver’s motivational state = needs, values, and desires of a perceiver at the time of perception
- influence on perception → see and hear what you want to
- can result in inaccurate perception and faulty decisions
- need to be aware of own motivation because faulty decisions because of inaccurate perception
can have drastic outcomes
The Perceiver’s Mood
perceiver’s mood = how a perceiver feels at the time of perception
- pos moods: more likely to perceive coworker, supervisors, subordinates and even their jobs in a
more pos light than when in a bad mood
Characteristics of the Target and Situation
Ambiguity of a Target
ambiguity = lack of clearness
- increasing ambiguity = increasingly difficult for perceiver to from accurate perception →
higher potential for error in perception
- when ambiguous target → often several perceivers come to different conclusions
- when target is ambiguous → beware of overconfidence about accuracy of perception + look
for additional info
Social Status of the Target
social status = person’s real or perceived position in society or in an organization
- bias: high SES = high intelligence, more credible, more knowledgeable, more responsible
- often SES is used to oversee good or bad skills → high SES often used for representative
reasons
- affirmative-action programs → used to equal out SES and other biases → BUT sometimes
perpetuate the problems and stereotypes → often then even seen more as second-class
citizens
Impression Management by the Target
impression management = attempt to control the perceptions or impressions of others → tactics
→ especially when interacting w/ a perceiver who has power over them or they are dependent on
→ 2-way street
- behavioral matching = target of perception matches their behavior to that of the perceiver
, 3
- self-promotion = target tries to present themself in as positive a light as possible
- conforming to situational norms = target followers agreed-upon rules for behavior in the
organization
- appreciating or flattering others = target compliments the perceiver. This tactic works best
when flattery is not extreme and when it involves a dimension important to the perceiver
- being consistent = target’s beliefs and behaviors are consistent. There is agreement between
target’s verbal and nonverbal behaviors
Information Provided by the Situation
situation = context or environment surrounding the perceiver and the target
Standing Out in the Crowd: The Effects of Salience in a Situation
salience = extent to which a target of perception stands out in a group of people or things
- often feels very self-conscious and conspicuous → beliefs that everyone is watching them →
other people also pay more attention to a salient person → salience does affect the perception
of target → outcomes
- extreme evaluations: more extreme pos or neg evaluation + are seen as more influential and
responsible for what happens to them and their group
- stereotyping: perceivers consider the thoughts, feelings and behaviors of salient people as more
consistent w/ their distinguishing feature then when not salient
→ can extremely affect performance of salient person → stereotype threat
→ can cause racial jokes and impairment and different treatment
→ stereotypes groups: people w/ disabilities, women, minorities
Biases and Problems in Person Perception
bias = systematic tendency to use or interpret information in a way that results in inaccurate
perceptions → likely to cause inappropriate decisions
Primary Effects = biased perception that results when the first information that a perceiver has
about a target has an inordinately large influence on the perceiver’s perception on the target
- common problem in interviews (decision is most often formed in the first few minutes)
- also problem in perception and evaluation of long-time members of an organization →
doesn’t see improvement or decrease in work of subordinate because of first impression
Contrast Effects = biased perception that results when perceptions of a target person are distorted
by the perceiver’s perception of others → stick out more
Halo Effects = biased perception that results when the perceiver’s general impression of a target
distorts their perception of the target on specific dimensions
- can be positive (= oversee many mistakes because of good overall impression) and negative (=
pick out every small mistake and overshadow many good qualities)
Similar-to-Me Effects
- more likely to like people sim to oneself more
- very important to overcome given today's diversity in organizations
Harshness, Leniency and Average Tendency Biases
- all named tendencies are problematic: 1. not correctly perceive variations in performance →
not get right feedback; 2. make it difficult to evaluate and compare the performance of
subordinates w/ different supervisors
Knowledge-of-Predictor Bias = biased perception that results when knowing a target’s standing on
a predictor of performance influences the perceiver’s perception of the target
, 4
- sometimes results in self-fulfilling prophecy = prediction that comes true because a perceiver
expects it to come true
Attribution Theory
attribution = explanation of the cause of behavior
attribution theory = group of theories that describes how people explain the causes of behavior
- interested in why people behave the way they do and what can be done to change their behavior
- in organizations: decisions made and actions taken = based on attributions → when accurate
good decisions; when not accurate bad decisions
- often: reaction to good or bad performance based on attributions
External and Internal Attributions
internal attributions = attributions that assigns the cause of behavior to some characteristic of the
target → ability, effort, and personality
external attributions = attribution that assigns the cause of behavior to outside forces → task
difficulty and luck
- attributions made for own behavior also influence own subsequent actions
Attributional Biases
- fundamental attribution error = tendency to overattribute behavior to internal rather than to
external causes
→ occurs because of 1) concentration on perception of the target’s behavior → focus on
person not situation
→ often simply unaware of the situational factors responsible for targets behavior
- actor-observer effect = tendency to attribute the behavior of others to internal causes and to
attribute one’s behavior to external causes
→ tend to think other people's behavior is caused by internal factors (stable) but ours to
external factors (variable)
→ greater focus on situation when we ourself behave → aware of external factors
- self-serving attribution = tendency to take credit for successes and avoid blame for failures
→ accepting credit for success is more common than avoiding blame for failure
→ works opposite way for target behavior perception
Effectively Managing a Diverse Workforce
Securing Top-Management Commitment to Diversity
- top management commitment to diversity is absolutely necessary for effectively managing a
diverse workforce
- top managers: high levels of authority, power, and status; encourage other members of
organization to be committed in diversity; devote resources to effective management
- helps to ensure that employee behavior is seen in right light
Diversity Training
- can facilitate the management of diverse workforces → objects used in training:
- making explicit and breaking down stereotypes in organisation
- make aware of different kinds of backgrounds, experiences and values
- show how to deal effectively w/ diversity-related conflicts and tensions
- can last hours, days etc. and includes (but not limited to): role-play, self-awareness activities and
awareness activities
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper julialeins. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 55628 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen