100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Study notes EC104: american reform €3,71
In winkelwagen

College aantekeningen

Study notes EC104: american reform

 2 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Revision notes with content from lectures and seminars for EC104 topic 15: America reform

Voorbeeld 2 van de 6  pagina's

  • 25 augustus 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • College aantekeningen
  • Claudia rei
  • Topic 15
avatar-seller
American reform: 1979-2001

Inequality in the US

Trends in wage inequality

● Acemoglu and Autor (2011) - wage premium fell in the 1970s but then rose for
3 decades (by about 97% by 2008)
● Real wages have risen for college graduates since 1980 - college wage
premium
○ Have fallen for less-educated workers - especially men
● Increasing polarisation in the US and EU
○ Growth in high-skill, high-wage and low-skill, low-wage jobs
● A&A consider a “canonical” model
○ Skilled and unskilled workers are substitutes
○ Exogenous tech change increases the relative productivity of skilled
workers
○ Can explain real earning declines for some, polarisation, tech change,
offshoring and outsourcing
● A&A propose another model which distinguishes form skills and tasks
○ Tasks can be performed by workers with different skill levels, by
machines or be offshored
○ Routinisation (computers replacing workers in routine tasks) is an
explanation of polarisation (1980-2006)
■ Real cost of performing standardised computations fell by 70% a
year
○ Jobs that are non-routine manual task intensive are harder to replace
○ Wages only rise for high-complexity jobs where computers are
complements, not substitutes

Trends in the top 1%

● Alvaredo et al - % of income received by the top 1% rose from 9-20% (1979-
2011)
○ Also in Australia, Canada and the UK
○ Does not hold in Europe and Japan
● Changes in demand and supply cannot explain this
● Several explanations:
○ Tax - most countries have cut top tax rates (top rate was 60% in 1932
US and <40% in 2011)
○ Pay determination - high earners bargained more as top rates fell
■ ICT, deregulation of finance and globalisation increased demand
for top skilled workers

, ○ Capital income and inheritance - inheritance flows are rising as a % of
national income in France and Germany
○ Wealth concentration - greater in the US (the top 1% owns 35% of
wealth)
○ Distribution of earned and capital income - 61% of individuals in the top
1% of capital income were in the top 20% of earned income (2000)

Welfare reform in the US

Changes in the 1990s

● Blank (2002) - Aid to Families with Dependent Children replaced with
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (1996)
○ Made block grants conditional on >50% of recipient families being in
work or training
○ Imposed a 5 year maximum for TANF fund recipients
● Minimum wage increased from $2.25 to $5.15 (1989-1997)
● Earned income tax credit expanded - subsidised low wage workers
● Increased the real income of a woman with 1 child working full time from
$10,500 to $12,650 (1989-2000)
● Spending on working families rose from $11-66.7 billion (1988-1999)
● Spending on non-working families fell from $24-13 billion
● Global influence - welfare reforms in Canada

Changes after the reform

● Blank (2002) - those claiming welfare fell by 56% (1994-2000)
● FLFP of single mothers with children rose by 10% (1994-1999)
● Women on welfare were more likely to work
● Families in poverty fell from 12-8.6% (1992-2000)
● Poverty among single-mother families fell from 35-25% (1992-2000)
○ Poorest quintile of single mothers had declining incomes
● These changes happened after the policy change
○ Booming economy also contributed
○ Hard to find causal inference

Welfare recipients (1999 and 2009)

● Bitler and Hoynes (2010) compared the profiles of welfare recipients in 1995
and during the Great Recession
● 1995 - 70% single women, 40% non-Hispanic whites, 34% non-Hispanic
blacks. Similar in 2009
● Most families receiving cash welfare combine it with other programmes
○ 1995 - 87% had food stamps and ⅓ were in govt housing

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper bethwalton03. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,71. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53068 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€3,71
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd