IB SL/HL Psychology (cognitive): To what extent is one cognitive process reliable
IB SL/HL Psychology (cognitive): Explain one model or theory of one cognitive process (9 marks)
IB HL/SL Psychology (cognitive): Describe one research study related to Schema Theory (9 marks)
Alles voor dit studieboek
(19)
Geschreven voor
University of Oxford
University of Oxford
Psychology
Alle documenten voor dit vak (17)
Verkoper
Volgen
lizzielewis-orr
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Explain the use of one research method used in the cognitive approach to understanding
human behaviour. [8]
The cognitive level of analysis (CLoA) studies the interaction between cognitive processes and
their effect on the behaviour exhibited by individuals. Psychologists working at the CLoA use
several different research methods to elicit the relationships between these cognitive processes,
such as memory, perception and problem-solving, and behaviour. Although cognitive processes
have biological correlates and origins, psychologists are unable to perceive these processes and
so they remain as abstract models. Despite this, one principle of the CLoA states that the mind
can and should be investigated scientifically, in order to take an empirical and unbiased view on
the concept of cognition, and therefore scientific methods such as laboratory experiments are
common at the CLoA.
Often, laboratory experiments are chosen to uncover a cause and effect relationship between a
cognitive process and a specific behaviour. This is exemplified through Loftus and Palmer’s study
[1974], which aimed to investigate the effect of leading questions on the reliability of memory.
Leading questions are designed to encourage a particular answer from the participant through
eliciting a particular schema through word association. 45 US student were asked to watch seven
clips of car accidents. After each clip, the participants were then asked to estimate the speed at
which the cars were travelling. The verb used within this question served as the independent
variable, with the experimenters asking ‘At what speed were the cars travelling at when they
(contacted/ hit / bumped / collided/ smashed) into each other?’. The study found that as the verb
used became more suggestive of speed, the mean speed estimates of the participants increased.
The participants in the contacted group had a mean estimate of 31.8mph, whereas the participants
in the smashed group had a mean estimate of 40.8mph. One explanation for these results is that
the different verbs used within the leading question trigger different schemas associated with the
car’s speed and the severity of the action, thus influencing the participant’s memory of an event.
The use of a strict experimental method allows a cause and effect relationship to be established
between the schemas associated with a particular word used in a leading question, and the
perceived memory recall of the event. However, this methodology is unable to conclude whether
this is due to response-bias factors, whereby the information provided within the leading question
simply influenced the participants’ answers, or whether it was able to completely reconstruct the
mental representation of the memory. Loftus and Palmer carried out further scientific
experimentation in order to understand more about this relationship. This is an example of how
experimental cognitive research can be used to begin to formulate hypotheses and models for
human cognitive processes. However, there are limitations in using experiments to study cognitive
processes, which arise from the artificiality of the methodology. For example, within this study the
participants were viewing a video in a laboratory, rather than witnessing a real life car crash, and
therefore the event lacks the emotional impact it would naturally have. This artificiality means that
the study lacks ecological validity, as we cannot be sure that the memory recall of the event would
have been affected in the same way in real life.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper lizzielewis-orr. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,57. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
