Samenvatting
Summary 2.3 History and Methods of Psychology: Problem 6
Summary of the literature, videos, tutorials, and exercises for problem 6 of course 2.3 History and Methods of Psychology.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 12 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 12 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
PROBLEM 6:KARL POPPER
Background:
- one of the greatest philosophers of science à social and political philosopher
- Took falsifiability as his criterion for demarcating science from non-science
- believed that scientific knowledge is provisional – the best we can do at the moment.
attempted to refute the classical positivist account of the scientific method à replacing induction
with the falsification principle.
Popper: Conjectures And Refutations
Popper’s Falsificationism
- Traditional account of knowledge was the platonic conception that it is justified, true, belief
- He claims that truth, justification and belief are not the distinguishing characteristics of
knowledge
Knowledge is not Justified
- We can never justify propositions or theories for several reasons
o We can never subject our theories to all possible tests, it is always possible that one of
the unconducted tests might falsify our theory
§ All tests that will be conducted will be a very small faction of all possible tests
o Does not lead to skepticism because he maintains that we can rationally criticize our
theories and hold those that have best survived our criticism
o Confirmation not the best method for arriving at truths
o Criticism is the best method of error elimination
o Knowledge grows only through correction of our mistakes à by falsifying our beliefs
and theories
Knowledge is not true
- Not something that is certainly true
- It is verisimilitude (truth-likeness) because it has survived our attempts to refute it
- Survival of our beliefs to these attempts at falsification allows us to say that these “look like
the truth” but are not absolutely true
Knowledge is not belief
- Knowledge not a matter of subjective belief but is objective in 2 ways
, o Claims when evaluation, become objects
o Problems, theories and arguments exist independently of whether anyone believes,
asserts or acts on these
Took biology as the most informative science for philosophy of science
- Evolutionary theory: exist as evolved organisms facing problems of reproductions in real
environment
§ we know that the environment tolerates our perceptions, theories and
movements because we are surviving
§ false theories/perceptions/movements can get us killed
How did Popper arrive at these conclusions?
- interested in the demarcation questions (when should a theory be characterized as
scientific?)
Science: relied on inductive, empirical method
o only if it rules out some observable states of affairs
o only legitimate to test only if it is an attempt to falsify that theory by seeing if states of
affairs can occur or not
General relativity (GR): Einstein’s theory of special relativity
- was risky (possible to deduce consequences from which in the light of the then dominant
Newtonian physics were improbable) and if they were false could falsify the whole theory.
- inconsistent with certain possible results of observation
- Is scientific
- makes bold, counter intuitive claims about nature of reality
- Can account for previously observed phenomena
Pseudoscience:
- Psychoanalysis: human behaviour is driven at least in part by unconscious desires and
motives.
- Freud posited the existence of the id, an unconscious part of the human psyche that aims
toward gratifying instinctive desires, regardless of whether this is rational.
- Not scientific à do not allow them to be falsified
§ Compatible with every possible human behaviour
- makes bold, counter intuitive claims about nature of reality
- Can account for previously observed phenomena
Good theory should divide the set of all statements derivable from it into 2 subsets
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper kianakyla. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen