Samenvatting
Summary Week 3 Personality Disorders
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
Summary of the reading list for Week 3 - Personality Disorders
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 36 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 36 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
2 beoordelingen
Door: ramssjaved • 2 jaar geleden
Door: agnieszkakusal • 3 jaar geleden
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Week 3: Personality DisordersIs the Dodo Bird Endangered in the 21st
Century?
Introduction
The Dodo bird hypothesis asserts that when bona fide treatments are compared – they yield
roughly equal outcomes
The Dodo bird debate – addresses an essential question about how psychotherapy works
- Which may account for why there are such “diametrically opposed
interpretations” of this literature
Overall – psychotherapy is more effective than no treatment or placebo controls – but:
1) How is psychotherapy effective?
2) Are some psychotherapies more effective than other psychotherapies?
The Empirically Supported Treatment (EST) Movement
A report by Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures
initiated the empirically supported treatment (EST) movement
The report included a list of empirically validated treatments – and the Task Force
recommended:
1) These treatments be taught in programs
2) The public, policy makers, and third parties be informed about these treatments
The aim of the report – was to ensure that clinical psychologists use ESTs in their practice
Compelling evidence – either supporting or refuting the Dodo bird hypothesis – would have
implications for psychotherapy research – including:
, 1) Whether research efforts should be directed toward discovering and validating
specific techniques
2) Whether factors common to most therapies – e.g., therapeutic alliance and installation
of hope – should be the primary focus of psychotherapy research
Such findings also have implications for practice – including:
1) The extent to which therapists should rely on treatment manuals in their practices
The Cognitive Contrast
Closely connected with both the Dodo bird hypothesis – and the EST debate – are the
questions of whether CBT is superior to other treatments
- And whether the EST movement is biased toward CBT treatments
There is mixed empirical support for the relative efficacy of CBT – particularly depending on
the outcome measures utilized
Discussion
One’s interpretation of the literature on the Dodo bird research – strongly associated with
one’s beliefs about how psychotherapy works
To the extent that the aim of psychotherapy is to reduce the severity of targeted symptoms at
the end of treatment
- It appears that some treatments are incrementally more effective than other
treatments
The Dodo bird hypothesis – had greater support with respect to secondary outcomes at both
(1) termination and (2) follow-up
- And perhaps in terms of primary outcomes at follow-up
Bona fide treatments – yield similar outcomes with respect to quality of (1) life measures and
(2) other measures of psychopathology – that were not the specific target of the treatment
There is stat sig heterogeneity among the primary outcomes at termination – the following are
studies that yielded the largest effect sizes:
, 1) One study- yielded the largest ES – which was almost twice as large as the next
largest difference
- Found that habit reversal therapy was more effective for reducing tic severity in
adults with TS – than supportive therapy
2) The next three studies with largest ES – found that CBT was superior to either
applied relaxation or to meditation – for the symptoms of social phobia
- CBT was superior to applied relaxation for treating panic attacks
A highly symptom-focused treatment – more effective than a less focused treatment – at
reducing a very or relatively specific symptom
There may be higher levels of treatment equivalence for some disorders – e.g., depression –
and greater treatment differences for other disorders – e.g., panic disorder
- There may be Dodo disorders and non-Dodo disorders
Cognitive Contrast
CBT – superior to psychodynamic therapies for treating specific symptoms – or targeted
problems – both at termination and at follow-up
CBT – stat more effective than other therapies at termination – for treating anxiety
Failed to find differences b/n CBT and other treatments – for secondary or non-disorder
specific outcomes
Implications and Conclusions
Some issues and diagnoses – require specific treatment techniques – e.g., habit reversal
therapy for tic disorders; CBT for panic disorder
- Others may respond equally well to variety of interventions
Psychotherapists should be cognitively flexible and capable of assessing (1) when specialized
techniques would be beneficial – and (2) when common factors may be most important
1) Need to be able to determine whether one treatment is better over another vs when
they are treating “Dodo disorders”
, 2) Need to be capable of helping clients articulate whether their main goal is symptom
relief – i.e., primary outcomes – or more general life changes – i.e., secondary
outcomes
The Dodo bird verdict – is a proxy for the debate between:
1) Medical Model of psychotherapy – i.e., common factors are important, but the
specific active ingredients are the key to healing
2) Contextual Model – i.e., psychotherapy as “a cultural healing practice”
The meta-analysis provided support for each model
1) In support of specific ingredients – at termination some treatments were more
effective than others for treating focused symptoms
- Here, CBT was stat more effective than alternative treatments
2) In support of contextual model – these effects were generally small
- These treatment differences do not extend to secondary outcomes – and usually
dissipate at follow-up
Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline
Personality Disorder
Abstract
Borderline PD – is a debilitating condition
- Several psychotherapies are considered effective
Psychotherapies – most notably (1) dialectical behavioral therapy and (2) psychodynamic
approaches – effective for BPD symptoms and related problems
- Effects were small – inflated by risk of bias and publication bias – and particularly
unstable at follow-up
Introduction
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper galinajimberry. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 73918 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen