100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Midterm Assignment Actors in World Politics SAMPLE €4,99   In winkelwagen

Essay

Midterm Assignment Actors in World Politics SAMPLE

 25 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

This document contains my midterm assignment for Actors in World Politics. This document is meant to be used as a SAMPLE for the assignment and should NOT be plagiarized. Believe me, you WILL GET CAUGHT. Turn it in runs plagiarism checks so please feel free to use it to get a sense of what instruct...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 2  pagina's

  • 15 oktober 2021
  • 2
  • 2019/2020
  • Essay
  • Onbekend
  • A
book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:
Alles voor dit studieboek (2)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (10)
avatar-seller
polscinotes
President Putin’s address about the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea

Prompted by backlash from the international community following Russia’s
annexation of Crimea, Russian President Vladimir Putin (2014) delivered a speech aimed at
defending his stance. In his speech, Putin proposes arguments supporting his main
conclusion: Crimea is rightfully a part of Russia and its annexation is legitimate. He argues
this is due to the region’s historical and cultural ties to Russia, which are used to emphasise
the legitimacy of the 2014 referendum advocating for the reunification of Crimea with Russia
(Putin, 2014, para. 4-12). He presents arguments highlighting the general desire for
reunification and seeks to justify Russia’s actions by defending the main claim. He thus
argues against the widespread notion in the wider political sphere that Crimea is a legitimate
part of Ukraine (Putin, 2014, para. 57-61).
Putin’s strongest premise to support his conclusion is that all peoples of the world
have the right to self-determination. He mentions the United Nations Charter, which “speaks
of the right of nations to self-determination”. This right, he states, should be defended and
adhered to, since it has been exercised through the Crimean referendum. The fact that most of
Crimea’s population voted “pro-reunification” is an indication of their willingness, rather
than violent political action, for reunification (Putin, 2014, para. 29-32). Putin’s argument
about Crimea’s right to self-determination and its link to Kosovo would make this an
“argument by analogy,'' as Weston (2017, p. 19) would call it in A Rulebook for Arguments.
His claim is stronger because it is an analogy based upon Kosovo’s independence, where the
same democratic process, a referendum, was recognised by ‘Western’ influences in a way it
has not in Crimea (Putin, 2014, para. 29-32). It must also be acknowledged that although he
puts forth strong arguments to back a referendum considered “in full compliance with
democratic procedures and international norms” (Putin, 2014, para. 2), his speech is filled
with loaded language appealing to the crowd’s emotions, even weakening his strongest
premise.
Putin’s weakest premise to promote his conclusion is his criticism of the Ukrainian
government, as it cannot directly be linked to issues of Crimean reunification with Russia. It
is based on domestic politics, specifically unemployment and economic migration. Therefore,
this argument’s foundation is “the incompetence of Ukrainian authorities to rule over
Crimea” (Putin, 2014, para. 21-26). Consequently, the argument presents fallacies, making it
unfit to effectively support the main point. The argument’s flaw is that it presents elements of
the ‘red herring’ fallacy. The premise “introduces an irrelevant or secondary subject and
thereby diverting attention from the main subject” (Weston, 2017, pp. 93-94). Putin, by
referring to Ukrainian internal politics does not present evidence to justify the reasoning
behind his conclusion, but draws attention to tensions within Ukraine.
The legitimate annexation of Crimea is upheld by substantial arguments with
foundations in internationally accepted law, as seen in Putin’s references to democratic
procedures compliant to international standards (Putin, 2014, para. 2). However, in his
speech, the reliability of the aforementioned claim is questioned, due to the multitude of
arguments flawed with fallacies, as seen in his “empty” argument pertaining to Ukraine’s
competence over a domestic affair (Putin, 2014, para. 21-26). In conclusion, examples of the

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper polscinotes. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 82871 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€4,99
  • (0)
  Kopen