Samenvatting
Talent Development & Creativity Summary of Lecture 5
Summary of Lecture 5 from Dr. Marijn van Dijk: Detecting and eliciting talent & creativity in scientific reasoning
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
TDC – Week 5 1Lecture Notes Week 5
21st Century Skills:
• Critical Thinking
• Creativity
• Collaboration
• Communication
Definitions of talent in education
• Retrospective
◦ looking for presence of precursors of talent
◦ hard to find!
◦ not useful for education
• Prospective
◦ early behavior is observes and various trajectories are being followed
Normative approach (Subotnik)
• look at norm population (when look at IQ scale you know how is high normative etc)
• the manifestation of performance that is clearly at the upper end of the distribution in a
talent domain even relative to that of other high-functioning individuals in that domain
◦ “potential”; “achievement”; “environment”
◦ influential cognitive and psychosocial variables are malleable and need to be
deliberately cultivates (e.g. motivation and opportunity)
• current inability to accurately identify who will be gifted in the long run → difference
between potential and actual realization of that in the future
• normative approach because takes distribution as starting point
• Subotnik focused only on high performers
Ipsative approach (more implicit also Subotnik)
• each person has own range (e.g. when
anxious move to lower end, when feel
good to higher)
• that is the reason why so difficult to
predict performance in the long run
because in them self also vary
,TDC – Week 5 2
Project “Curious Minds”
• observed that young children where really interested in science but as soon as they entered
school this interest seemed to disappear
• 8 universities
• University of Groningen: Developmental Psychology
◦ 9 PhD-projects
◦ fundamental and applied research > intervention in schools
• concept idea: every child is talented!
◦ Partly historic statement in a historical context of education! Because project started
when gifted education was more popular → identify gifted children and offer them
special education
◦ looking at ipsative approach and responsibility of educational context to bring out what
every child has in him → looking for potential
▪ when teach science in particular way very child can become talented
◦ society needed scientists and project stressed idea that every child is talented
◦ also has backlash (“be best you can be”) → lead to achievable society
◦ Example: Video of Wesley and the
air squirt
▪ which “talented” behavior do
you observe? → child discover
himself
▪ What does the teacher do? →
teacher help him to find out:
connected previous knowledge
and continuously asks
questions (verbal); set
boundaries → had to
think before pushing
(guide attention of child)
▪ when manipulate task it
constantly changes
▪ core aspects of triangle
continuously change
each other
▪ mini components
interact with each other
(figure 2)
▪ interaction of time → talent
is a development and
constantly changing
▪ shows how talent evolves
during 1 by 1 interaction
• Video is an example of a co-
constructive process:
◦ child builds insights,
predictions and explanations
◦ the importance of adequate
guidance of teacher
, TDC – Week 5 3
▪ helps child construct predictions and explanations that were not there when the
learning activity started
▪ giving adequate help means that the process is a process of co-construction
• What teachers should do is encouraging upward spirals
◦ co-adaption/self-organization
▪ e.g. child likes dinosaurs > parent buy book about it > knowledge and interest grows
in child > parents take their child to museum → like positive feedback loop, positive
behaviors influence each other and create upper spiral
▪ can also be interrupted e.g. child prefers watch TV show and forgets about dinosaur
◦ many factors positively influence each other → excelling
◦ also in educational processes
▪ NB: it places the burden on education
▪ NB: supportive environment, distributing the cognitive load
• Upward spiral (like positive feedback loop) vs attractors
◦ can be positive but also ngative
◦ recurrent or stable patterns of actions (when time passes on attractor state become
stronger and harder to change) → interaction pattern that has evolved in certain direction
and has required a certain stability over time
▪ patterns are shaped over time (self evolved)
◦ are difficult to break, behavior is being pulled back
◦ teacher (explanations, instructions etc) ↔ student (listening, responses)
• state space grids
◦ suitable for describing interactions between ordinal variables at micro level
◦ attractor detection
◦ have behavior of on person on one axis and the behavior of the other one on another axis
and than put dot down (for everything teacher says→ e.g. no questions, closed or open
questions; same for child → responses given by child) → than see if attractors emerge
over time
• Example: looked at attractor states in second year education in English lesson
◦ Which question and answer patterns
do teachers and student ask
◦ coded questions and responses (5 for
each per question) of both
◦ figure show how interactive lesson
was (red→ low level of response)
• similar pattern observed in other studies:
◦ 16 EFL lessons (left all on top of each other):
▪ the lesson duration varied between 13-41 minutes
▪ mean # evens in complex: 5,8% of the lesson time
▪ students give very few complex answers
→ found attractor in yellow square in the middle
(teacher asked display question e.g. “where do
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper EllaBergmann. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen