100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Societal Challenges & Innovation Theory €7,49
In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Societal Challenges & Innovation Theory

1 beoordeling
 54 keer bekeken  3 keer verkocht

Innovation Sciences Utrecht University (UU): Analysis of innovation using theories of technical change and innovation for sustainable development.

Voorbeeld 2 van de 121  pagina's

  • 18 november 2021
  • 121
  • 2020/2021
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (2)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: charlotteschildknegt • 1 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
Samme
Unruh 2000 – Understanding Carbon Lock-in
Problem Lock-in of technological and institutional co-evolution driven by path-
dependent increasing returns to scale

Method Exploration of interlocking technological, institutional and social forces
that can create policy inertia towards the mitigation of global climate
change

Aim It is therefore hoped that this exploration will illustrate a set of issues
that has been underappreciated in climate change policy debates

Deliver conceptual framework for carbon lock-in

Key concept Techno-institutional complex; carbon lock-in

Theories Path dependency (lock-in; increasing-returns)

Explore issues of lock-in towards a framework of interaction between technologies,
organisations, and institutions:

- Technological lock-in (LTS; RBV; IS)
o Technological systems: emphasizes positive feedback economics in creating
lock-in among large systems of interrelated technologies
- Institutional lock-in (neo-institutional)
o Role of private institutions in enhancing technological lock-in
o Examination of the impact created by formal governmental institutions

Barriers to the diffusion of carbon-saving technologies
Climate change results from consumer demand adoption of non-fossil fuel energy is both a
technological (bottom-up) and an economic (top-down) challenge: cost debate

Bottom-up studies find technology reduces carbon emission and lowers cost. If this is so, the
question arises “why don't carbon-saving technologies and practices diffuse faster if they exist,
save money and reduce climate impacts?”. Top-down models point toward technologies
cannot be cost saving when the total, economy-wide costs of their adoption are considered

Evidence for energy-saving opportunities exist but there are barriers to adoption

Technological systems
Fossil fuel energy is a large technological system: inter-related components connected in a
network or infrastructure that includes physical, social and informational elements.
Technological systems interconnected: overarch complex technological system; overarch
architecturally linked technological components/artifacts multilevel (levels of analysis)




1

, The evolution of technological systems
After era of competition a dominant design emerges, and a shift occurs from product
(Schumpeterian) innovation to incremental process (Usherian) improvement. Inferior design
can become dominant design over superior design in a path-dependent process due to
strategy, timing, historical circumstances. S-curve visualises increasing returns process:




Traditional economics focus on upper (decreasing returns) half: long-run equilibrium returns.
However, lower (increasing returns) half can create indeterminacy in competitive outcome

Four classes of increasing returns (positive feedback economics):

- Scale economies: production cost decline as fixed costs are spread over increasing
production volume
- Learning economies: reduce cost and improve performance as specialised skills and
knowledge accumulate through production and market experience
- Adaptive expectations: increasing adoptions reduces uncertainty, both users and
producers become increasingly confident about quality, performance, and permanence
- Network economies: emerge due to the interrelations among technical systems

After industry shake-out surviving oligopolistic firms shift from product to process
innovation and specialised knowledge development (market demand; complementary assets)
Logic of specialisation: continued refinement of dominant design can define a technological
trajectory along which firms incrementally develop know-how repeat incremental
investments commit firm to dominant design trajectory and create lock-in at firm level
incumbents are rarely source of radical innovations: core competencies become core rigidities



2

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Samme. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52510 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€7,49  3x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd