College aantekeningen
OV aantekeningen HC en boek Deeltentamen 2
- Instelling
- Universiteit Utrecht (UU)
OV aantekeningen HC en boek Deeltentamen 2
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Criteria for the evaluation of social research:- Reliability > repeatable & consistent
- Replicability > replicate the findings of others
- Validity > integrity of the conclusions
o Measurement validity > whether a measure that is devised for a concept really does
reflect the concept that it is supposed to be denoting
o Internal validity > whether a conclusion that incorporates a causal relationship
between two or more variables holds water
o External validity > whether the results of a study can be generalized beyond the
specific research context
o Ecological validity > whether social scientific findings are applicable to
people’s everyday, natural social settings
o Inferential validity > whether the authors of a report of research produce inferences
and draw conclusions that are warranted by their research and findings generated
from it
> criteria mainly for quantitative research, qualitative researchers propose different criteria:
- Trustworthiness > criterion of how good a qualitative study is:
o Credibility > parallels with internal validity: how believable are findings
o Transferability > parallels with external validity: do the findings apply to other
contexts
o Dependability > parallels reliability: are the findings likely to apply at other times
o Confirmability > parallels objectivity: has the investigator allowed his/her values to
intrude to a high degree
- Authenticity > concerning broader political impact of research
o Fairness > does the research fairly represent different viewpoints among members of
the social setting?
o Ontological authenticity > does the research help members to arrive at a better
understanding of their social milieu?
o Educative authenticity > does the research help members to appreciate better the
perspectives of other members of their social setting?
o Catalytic authenticity > has the research acted as an impetus to members to engage
in action to change their circumstances?
o Tactical authenticity > has the research empowered members to take the steps
necessary for engaging in action?
Other qualitative:
- Reliability and validity:
External reliability > the degree to which a study can be replicated (= difficult)
Internal reliability > whether, when there is more than one observer, members of the
research team agree about what they see and hear
External validity > whether there is a correspondence between researchers’
observations and the theoretical ideas they develop
Internal validity > the degree to which findings can be generalized across social
settings
, Criteria for indicators:
- Reliability > consistency of a measure of a concept. 3 factors involved:
Stability > stable over time? Results do not fluctuate
Internal reliability > are the indicators that make up the scale consistent?
Inter-rater reliability > subjective judgement involved: lack of consistency in their
decisions
- Measurement validity > refers to the issue of whether an indicator that is devised to gauge a
concept really measures that concept. Establishing validity:
Face validity > the measure apparently reflects the content of the concept in
question
Concurrent validity > the researcher employs a criterion on which cases are known to
differ and that is relevant to the concept in question
Predictive validity > researcher uses a future criterion measure, rather than a
contemporary one
Construct validity > researcher is encouraged to deduce hypotheses from a theory
that is relevant to the concept
Convergent validity > the validity of a measure ought to be gauged by comparing it to
measures of the same concept developed through other methods
Variables:
Dichotomous > nominal > ordinal > interval/ratio
Averages:
- Mean > gemiddelde
- Median > mid-point
- Mode > most frequent
Kwalitatief > verband tussen variabelen
Kwantitatief > achterliggende gedachtes achterhalen
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ehouwy. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,48. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67474 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen