100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Topic: Organisations In The Media (Readings & Lectures) €13,99   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Topic: Organisations In The Media (Readings & Lectures)

8 beoordelingen
 491 keer bekeken  69 keer verkocht

Providing an in-depth and complete section of notes from the course of Topic: Organisations in the Media. The present document includes a summary of all lectures (1 to 6) and readings for this course. For this course, weekly readings were assigned to be completed via Perusall, therefore, in the...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 119  pagina's

  • 11 december 2021
  • 119
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (12)

8  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: ezgikeeskin • 1 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 1 jaar geleden

Hey there! Thank you lots for the review. Happy to hear what could be improved :)

review-writer-avatar

Door: alexandraandreeva • 1 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 1 jaar geleden

Hey Alexandra! Can you send me a message to kindly let me know what you did not like / which issues you encountered with the notes? I’ll be happy to act upon it! Thanks!

review-writer-avatar

Door: annihreponen • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you! Happy to hear what could be improved

review-writer-avatar

Door: fennaxm819 • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you for the review!

review-writer-avatar

Door: swaanvbremen • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you!

review-writer-avatar

Door: pimsteeman01 • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you! Happy to know what could be improved!

review-writer-avatar

Door: romytwaalfhoven • 2 jaar geleden

highlighted the main points of the articles, but I'd like to have some more own interpretations to make it more understandable. Also many research questions were unanswered.

reply-writer-avatar

Door: FrancescaReverdito • 2 jaar geleden

Thank you for the feedback! Indeed, in the description of the file you find that I included only a brief summary of the articles and that not all research questions were answered (though, the majority were indeed answered). Anyhow, I appreciate your feedback and the time you took to write this!

Bekijk meer beoordelingen  
avatar-seller
FrancescaReverdito

Beschikbare oefenvragen

Oefenvragen 25 Oefenvragen
Gratis 14 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

Give a definition of \"reputation\"

Antwoord: It\'s the generalised expectation about a firm’s future behaviour or performance based on collective perceptions (either direct or, more often, vicarious) of past behaviour or performance

2.

Give a definition of \"legitimacy\"

Antwoord: It refers to the collective perception about which actors and institutions have the right to rule, regulate, and decide

3.

What does \"reputational spiral effect\" refer to?

Antwoord: Corporations with good reputations are more likely to attract positive coverage, whereas firms with bad reputations tend to receive more negative coverage

4.

First problem of reputational management: Politics problem

Antwoord: All public organisations, in one way or another, are connected to a political, superordinate level - which becomes a problem because 1. Mission cannot be changed by the organisation itself 2.Political processes interfere with how public organisations are run

5.

Second problem of reputational management: Consistency problem

Antwoord: Public organisations have responsibilities that require the application of inconsistent sets of values. Values related to morality may conflict with a strong market orientation

Oefenvragen 14 Oefenvragen
Gratis 6 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

Provide a definition of \"mediatization\"

Antwoord: Mediatization is the process by which individuals and collective actors adapt to the demands of publicity and public attention

2.

What does the \"third-person-effect hypothesis\" entail?

Antwoord: The third-person effect hypothesis refers to the individual\'s overestimation of the effect of a mass communicated message on the generalised other - or an underestimation of the effect of a mass communicated message on themselves

3.

Mediatization can be best understood by means of 3 dimensions. Name these.

Antwoord: 1. Perception 2. Structure 3. Behaviour

4.

With reference to the dimensions of mediatization, describe the first dimension, \"\'perception\"

Antwoord: Mediatization is seen as a reaction to a perception of an increased importance of media and communication

5.

With reference to the dimensions of mediatization, describe the second dimension, \"\'structure\"

Antwoord: A perception of media and communication as increasingly important implies that the organization takes action on this and concurrently makes changes in its structural dimension

Oefenvragen 10 Oefenvragen
Gratis 5 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

What does Image Restoration Theory entail?

Antwoord: Image restoration/repair theory outlines the strategies that can be used to restore one\'s image in an event where reputation has been damaged

2.

What does Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) entail?

Antwoord: Crisis managers should match strategic crisis responses to the level of crisis responsibility and reputational threat posed by a crisis

3.

SCCT distinguishes between 3 crisis clusters. Name these.

Antwoord: 1. Victim cluster 2. Accidental cluster 3. Preventable cluster

4.

Name the difference between Image Repair Theory and SCCT

Antwoord: while image Repair Theory suggests one single way to respond to damaged reputation (due to a crisis), differently, SCCT implies that based on the responsibility that one has towards the crisis and the threat that this can imply, diverse strategies should be employed

5.

According to Eriksson, what is effective social media crisis communication about? Name 5 points.

Antwoord: 1. Exploit potential of social media (choose right message to be delivered at the right time) 2. Do pre-crisis work (make friends before you need them) 3. Using social media monitoring 4. Prioritise traditional media 5. Use social media strategic crisis communication

Oefenvragen 16 Oefenvragen
Gratis 5 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

What does the \"sense-making perspective\" refer to when it comes to the relationship between PR-professionals and journalists?

Antwoord: Refers to the communicative interaction between PR-professionals and journalists. it is a discursive process of constructing and negotiating frames on company news

2.

Which levels of influence on the news do Cornelissen et al. (2010) distinguish? Name and describe these

Antwoord: While (1) journalists have little control to the final news distributed (because usually they write for someone so to ensure their article gets published) (2) At the news routines, editors and other supervisors are in charge of whether a story (the journalist\'s story, to be precise) gets finally published, or not. They determine what changes to make on the article, what title it should have & so on The (3) news organisation refers to the influences on the news from within the organisation. That is, aspects such as organisational values and corporate culture shape how an article should result once it is ready to be published The (4) external to the news organisation refers to the influences on the news organisation from outside the organisation - which may include not only environment, but also relationships and network Lastly, (5) ideology refers to the system news media adopt to produce meanings and ideas. That is, for instance, news can have different meanings based on where they are published

3.

Define \"editorial subsidies\"

Antwoord: Targeted, tailored, page-ready news copy that contains key client messages

4.

Name 2 reasons why PR-practitioners are so keen to target online news

Antwoord: 1. It is typically much easier to gain coverage in online-only news spaces 2. Google changed their algorithm to Panda, news sites rather than content farms now are the top dogs on Google – therefore, online news see increased sales

5.

Carroll & McCombs (2003) name 6 key attributes of corporate reputation: What are these?

Antwoord: 1. Overall appeal 2. Products 3. Services 4. Vision and leadership 5. Financial strength 6. Social responsibility

Oefenvragen 23 Oefenvragen
Gratis 5 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

Define Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Antwoord: A desired business action that benefits both society and businesses

2.

Why companies engage in CSR?

Antwoord: Extrinsic motives: engaging in CSR attempting to increase its profits Intrinsic motives: practicing CSR out of genuine concern for a focal issue

3.

Define Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA)

Antwoord: CSA refers to a company’s public stance on controversial salient socio-political issues as a way of engaging with public and gaining legitimacy

4.

Why companies engage in CSA?

Antwoord: 1. To increase legitimacy 2. To stand up on behalf of their stakeholders

5.

Ciszek & Logan (2018) say to stop trying to \"fit a square peg into a round hole\". What do they refer to?

Antwoord: Instead of keep on focusing on dialogue (which is really hard to find on social media), the authors discuss the concept of dissensus. Indeed, social media sphere there is more often dissensus than consensus (where unanimity is not required)

Oefenvragen 19 Oefenvragen
Gratis 8 verkocht

Enkele voorbeelden uit deze set oefenvragen

1.

What does it mean to aim developing a PR-theory specifically for social media?

Antwoord: 1. Recognising the value of social media for PR 2. Understanding the unique features of social media most useful in public relations

2.

Kent & Li (2019) list 9 main characteristics of social media. Name these.

Antwoord: 1. Committment 2. Cost of doing good business 3. Intimacy 4. Identity 5. Trust 6. Transparency 7. Physical presence 8. Genuine friendships 9. Longevity

3.

Name and describe the two different traditions in PR

Antwoord: 1. Rhetorical tradition – Sees the main function of public relations as content crafting and messaging, storytelling, and framing communications 2.Relational tradition – posits that the main function of public relations is to help an organization to build and maintain mutual and beneficial relationships with its publics

4.

What does the normative/optimistic view of PR entail?

Antwoord: PR should work towards the public interest, rather than the private interest of the organization. PR should use communication to adjust their ideas and behaviour to those of others rather than to try to control how other think and behave

5.

What does the critical view of PR entail?

Antwoord: The aim of PR is to achieve change by persuasively advancing and potentially privileging particular meanings. According to this view, PR is only about making money

WEEK 1 – Organizatins and corporate reputation
Buffering negative news: Individual-level effects of company visibility, tone, and
pre-existing attitudes on corporate reputation
Jonkman, J.G.F., Boukes, M., Vliegenthart, R., & Verhoeven, P. (2019). Buffering negative news: Individual-level effects of company
visibility, tone, and pre-existing attitudes on corporate reputation. Mass Communication and Society. Advance online
publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1694155



This paper seeks to inform agenda-setting research by refining and testing key propositions
about the direct and conditional influence of corporate visibility and tone on corporate
reputation. The methodological approach enables to make convincing causal claims about the
relationship between exposure to company news and the reputations of these corporations in
the eye of the public (Meijer & Kleinnijenhuis, 2006b). Altogether, the present research
questions will be tackled: to what extent do media visibility and tone of coverage influence
corporate reputation, and how are these media effects moderated by prior reputation?


This study has examined the influence of media visibility and tone of news coverage on
corporate reputation and how these effects are moderated by prior reputation. The results of
the study suggest that corporate visibility in the news can have a negative effect on
reputation, whereas tone can have a positive effect. Specifying this effect of valence into
more detail, the paper shows that the effect of negative news is significantly stronger than
that of positive news. Moreover, analysis at the individual level enabled an assessment of
whether certain people are more susceptible to these influences than others are  support is
found for the theoretical argument: A positive prior reputation may indeed function as a
“buffer” against future negative news coverage (Coombs & Holladay, 2006; Sohn & Lariscy,
2015).


Study questions:
1. What is ‘corporate reputation’?
Corporate reputation is a central concept in management and public relations literature, and
refers to the way in which members of the public, or specific organizational stakeholders,
evaluate a firm
2. How are media visibility and reputation related, according to the findings of this
article?




1

, The results of the study suggest that corporate visibility in the news can have a negative
effect on reputation. The more a company is covered in the news, the more its reputation will
suffer (because news often make use of negativity appeals).




3. How are the tone of news coverage and reputation related, according to the findings
of this article?
Visibility and tone are so strongly correlated: Exposure to more company news in most cases
means exposure to more negative company news. That is, similarly to the previous question,
because negativity is often used in the news, the more a company is visible in the news
coverage, the more it will be discussed negatively – and the more its reputation will be
harmed.
4. How does pre-existing reputation affect the effect of the tone of news coverage on
corporate reputation?
Corporations with good reputations are arguably more likely to attract positive coverage,
whereas firms with bad reputations tend to receive more negative coverage (Deephouse,
2000). This finding may point to a sort of “reputational spiral effect” through which firms
with good reputations benefit from coverage, whereas coverage is mainly disadvantageous
for companies of poor repute. In particular, the study finds that negative effects of news
coverage on reputation are less powerful for corporations with better prior reputations (prior
reputation functions as a “buffer”).


Social media and the formation of organizational reputation
Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019). Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Academy of Management
Review, 44(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0280 (Links to an external site.)



The rise of social media is changing how evaluative judgments about organizations are
produced and disseminated in the public domain. In this article, it is discussed how these
changes question traditional assumptions that research on media reputation rests upon.


Extant research on the interrelations between organizations and the media system, and on
how the latter influences the formation of organizational reputation, is based on assumptions
developed when most publicly available evaluations of organizations were produced and
disseminated by traditional news media (or the organizations themselves). In this article, it is


2

,argued that these assumptions have become less accurate and/or productive in a modified
media landscape, where social media and digital technologies are changing how information
about organizations is produced and disseminated in the public domain, even by traditional
news media.


The present framework begins to account for the active role of these audiences in shaping the
content of publicly available evaluations, as well as the paths and patterns of their diffusion.
This framework draws attention to how social media now enable these audiences to
independently exchange and disseminate evaluations in the public domain, reaching vast
audiences without necessarily relying on the gatekeeping role of news media. By doing so
organizational audiences are now able to publicly challenge evaluations offered by the media,
or even to subvert images projected by organizations themselves to highlight contradic- tions
between communication and action. These changes suggest that in future research scholars
should pay more attention to the active and direct engagement of audiences, rather than
assuming that audiences influence reputation mainly when the news media pay attention to
their actions (e.g., King, 2011).


The second framework also highlights how social media have amplified the possibility that
organizational audiences will expose themselves to different partial and possibly inaccurate
representations and will propagate these representations selectively to restricted groups that
insulate themselves from alternative and opposing views. Current theories tend to consider
the public sphere as a large venue where news media mediate most efforts to disseminate or
dispute evaluations in the public domain. In the new media landscape, instead, the
fragmentation of media and audiences and the selective exposure to and propagation of
heterogeneous information are increasingly segmenting the public sphere into multiple
“interaction arenas” (Bromberg & Fine, 2002).




3

, 4

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper FrancescaReverdito. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €13,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79079 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€13,99  69x  verkocht
  • (8)
  Kopen