100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

IPC Lecture notes

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
16
Geüpload op
19-12-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Part 2 of other Interpersonal Communication notes











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 december 2021
Aantal pagina's
16
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Daniel huisman
Bevat
Alle colleges

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

LECTURE 10

ASSERTIVENESS
Definition of assertiveness
- Assertion: Standing up for personal rights and expressing thoughts, feelings, and beliefs
in direct, honest and appropriate ways which respect for the rights of other people.
- Skill
- Knowledge and awareness of your (and other’s) “right”
- Taking situations and others into account.
Examples assertiveness
Standing up for yourself, while respecting others:
- Making reasonable requests, deal with reasonable refusals
- Refusing an unreasonable request
- Asking others to change their behavior
- Expressing disagreement, responding to criticism
- Giving (impopular) personal opinions
- Expressing positive or negative feelings
- Giving and accepting compliments (+)
- Admitting mistakes and shortcomings (+)
Non-assertive --- Assertive --- Aggressive
Consequences of assertiveness
- Sometimes assertiveness turns into (passive) aggressiveness (or controlling
assertiveness): can be annoying for other
- Stand up for your ‘rights’ comes with risk for:
o Conflict (cf. conflict avoidance)
o Threat of needs/wishes/rights other (cf. politeness)
Politeness theory; face work
- Managing the identity of the conversation partner.
- Politeness: Face saving acts to reduce face-threats (positive and negative face)
- Positive politeness: Prevent disturbing positive relationship
- Negative politeness: Prevent loss off autonomy other
- Assertiveness=non-coercive (cf. Negative politeness) and friendly (cf. Positive
politeness)

,Styles of responding: verbal behavior
Speech act theory
- Ant utterance is an action with a particular effect.
o Locutionary act
! The actual utterance of words with a specific conventional meaning
(phonetics, syntax, semantics)
o Illocutionary act
! The “force” (action) of an utterance (intended meaning)
! Promise, demand, request

, o Perlocutionary act
! The effect the utterance has on a listener.
! Determined by listener
o Direct versus indirect speech acts
! Direct speech act: Literal force: Literal (locutionary) and intended
(illocutionary) are the same
! Indirect speech act: literal (locutionary) and intended (illocutionary) are
different.
Request to close the door
- “Close the door” (only direct one)
- “Can you close the door?”
- “Would you mind closing the door”
- “It can help to close the door”
- “Did you forget the door?”
- “Do you believe it would have a negative psychological effect on you if you closed the
door?”
- “It’s getting cold in here”
- “I do not want the cats to escape”
- “Where you born in church?”
Indirect language is often more polite, but less clear
- Lower risk for conflict
- Higher risk of misunderstanding
You-language
- You just don’t want to cooperate; you are an anti-social freeloader!”
Better: (I-language)
- Describe behavior (concretely): “The joint assignment of this week, you did not share
your part.”
- Emphatic: “I understand you are really busy” (cf. perspective taking)
- Your reaction: “I find this really unpleasant”
- Request for change “I would really appreciate it if you share your contribution this
week”
- We-language: “Apparently we have different ideas about our collaboration” (the 3rd
story)


Non-assertive:
- Hesitation, very soft voice, gaze aversion
- Avoiding topic, no self-disclosure, not expressing opinion
Assertive
- Clear/ firm tone of voice, eye gaze, controlled gestures, quick responses
- Raise topic, self-disclosure, express opinion
Passive aggressive
- Negative expression. Slamming door with no explanation
- Avoiding topic, indirect (sarcastic)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
defneturkeli Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
17
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
16
Documenten
5
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen