100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Distinction level Part B of Unit 6 exam January 2022 MOCK 2 (The Fachetti Group) €7,44
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Business 2016 NQF
  6.  
  7. Unit 6 - Principles of Management

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Distinction level Part B of Unit 6 exam January 2022 MOCK 2 (The Fachetti Group)

6 beoordelingen
 4087 keer bekeken  22 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Unit 6 - Principles of Management
  • Instelling
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Boek
  • BTEC Level 3 National Business Student Book 2

Distinction level Mock question report on The Fachetti Group case study in preparation for the unit 6 exam in January 2022. This is a mock has been looked at and marked by a fully qualified A-Level/BTEC Business teacher. This report was DONE UNDER TIMED CONDITIONS. . Feel free to leave a review. Th...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 4  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 9 januari 2022
  • 4
  • 2021/2022
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

  • unit 6
  • principles of management
  • btec
  • btec
  • business
  • btec business
  • btec business

Gekoppeld boek

book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:

Meer samenvattingen voor studieboek

  • Business Level 3 Exam Unit 6 - Principles of Management Full Exam Report Local Gym Plc
  • Summary BTEC Level 3 Unit 6 - Principles of Management- Report and presentation structure guide
  • Unit 7- Business + Decision + Making summary and complete notes
Alles voor dit studieboek (32)

Geschreven voor

  • BTEC
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Business 2016 NQF
  • Unit 6 - Principles of Management
Alle documenten voor dit vak (143)

6  beoordelingen

review-writer-avatar

Door: nargesahmadi • 2 jaar geleden

The report and PowerPoint are a copy of each other. This is a scam and misleading. I want a refund.

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

For this mock the task for the report and slides are very similar hence why there is some copy and pasting. This was also done under timed conditions so this is why some things had to be rushed and copied so it comes out as a realistic model.

review-writer-avatar

Door: adnaanpunii08 • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: jasonburns • 2 jaar geleden

this essay is not close to a distinction level, there are no numbers mentioned or talk about revenue, net profit etc... the paragraphs are no where near in enough depth as a distinction piece should be - very disappointed and I cannot even get my money back :(

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

This was marked by a fully qualified teacher. I understand it might not be perfect but I have made it clearly many times I am also a student. It is likely that I have picked up marks in other parts of the mock and that is what picked up these errors.

reply-writer-avatar

Door: jasonburns • 2 jaar geleden

how have you been given a distinction without talk of money?? just asked my teacher and he said its most definetely not distinction level

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

The presentation has talk of money within it. Also as long as a reference they are losing or gaining money it still is considered "relevent in context" so numbers would help but not needed. So i might have lost many like 1 mark and even then not really as i have mentioned other figures from the case study as the topic was about quality standards.

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

So please it would be nice if you would give me a more reasonable review considering I have proven a fair point here. If not that is understandable and I will respect the decision you make regardless.

review-writer-avatar

Door: teachersaddiq • 2 jaar geleden

review-writer-avatar

Door: kelvinbenjamin • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

Thanks for the review. Feel free to give feedback :)

review-writer-avatar

Door: ykay_17 • 2 jaar geleden

reply-writer-avatar

Door: RihtikSohal • 2 jaar geleden

Thanks for the review. Feel free to give feedback :)

Verkoper

avatar-seller
RihtikSohal

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

This is a formal report regarding the Quality Management at The
Fachetti Group

To: Fabio Fachetti
From: Rihtik Sohal
Date: 08/01/2022

1. Introduction
This report is going to look over Quality Management and its importance to The
fachetti group. This report will also be giving recommendations and proposals which
should be considered and looked into.

The Fachetti Group (TFG) is a restaurant and food manufacturing business. This
business is run by Fabio Fachetti who is a well known established individual as he is
a celebrity chef and TV presenter. He is also famous for his ability to inspire and
engage his staff. TFG is also known for its B2B (business to business) interactions
as they sell large amounts of their products to the UK’s major supermarkets. TFG
was split into 2 separate divisions which were the restaurant division and the
manufacturing division. There are 2 managers who used to run each division. There
is Katrina Szynalski who has been in TFG for 20 years as head chef and manager of
the restaurant division. She takes a democratic leadership and management style.
She worked in an area which had high rent and rates and also paid above average
wages for the instrusty standard which ultimately caused her a lot of cash flow
problems. Katrina is currently the deputy divisional manager for manufacturing. Then
there is Sunny Elder who runs the manufacturing division. Sunny takes an autocratic
leadership style which has resulted in him running a very highly efficient workforce.
In TFG there is a large amount of conflict between the 2 managers as their
leadership styles clash which is an issue which needs to be addressed.

2. Issues
2.1 Conflict between the managers- The two managers Katrina and Sunny have a
conflict which can cause a negative impact on TFG which has a good chance of
hindering the quality of the workforce. As the workforce is not working together TFG
will not be working towards the same goals and this ultimately would bring down the
quality management of TFG as well as their ability to use and work with employees
to a high quality. This can be due to a lack of direction from HR and other elements
which make it so that TFG is not able to run effectively as it could be.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper RihtikSohal. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,44. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52510 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€7,44  22x  verkocht
  • (6)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd