Samenvatting
CTA Court Cases - summary Tax/ Taxation - TAX4862
- Vak
- Instelling
All the court cases relevant to CTA and ITC is summed up in one document, giving information about the court case and the principle.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 9 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 9 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
gesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
jonelleholtz
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Important court decisions – ITC 2019Please note: Marks will only be awarded for principles from these cases when
relevant to a discussion. No marks will be awarded for the case names.
Relevant to Word/phrase Name of court case and principle
Def: gross Resident Cohen v CIR:
income “ordinary residence” would be the country to which a person would
naturally and as a matter of course return from his wanderings.
CIR v Kuttel:
“ordinary residence” = place where you normally reside, apart from
temporary/occasional absences.
Def: gross Amount CIR v Lategan:
income Not only money, but also the value of every form of property
earned by the TP, which has a money value, whether corporeal or
incorporeal.
CIR v Butcher Bros (Pty) Ltd:
The onus of establishing an amount rests upon the Commissioner.
CSARS v Brummeria:
Interest-free loans granted to a TP in consideration for the
acquisition of life-interest in units does constitute a benefit of which
a value can be determined to be included as part of gross income.
(A benefit with an ascertainable value is included in gross income)
Def: gross From a source CIR v Lever Brothers and Unilever:
income within RSA – What is the originating cause of the income? OR Where is the
true source originating cause located?
Def: gross Accrued to CIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd:
income “Accrued to” implies that the TP should be entitled to an amount.
The physical receipt thereof in the yoa as well as the enforceability
thereof, is irrelevant. E.g. Instalment payable after year end has
accrued, although not due and payable.
CIR v Witwatersrand Association of Racing Clubs:
The disposal of income after it has accrued to a TP does not
influence the taxability of that accrual in the hands of the TP.
Mooi v SIR:
The “accrual” should be unconditional. Only after all conditions
have been fulfilled, accrual can take place.
, Def: gross Received by Geldenhuys v CIR:
income “Received by” means “on behalf” and “for his own benefit”.
Pyott Ltd v CIR:
Deposits received by a TP and applied for his own benefit should
be included in his gross income.
MP Finance Group CC v CSARS:
An amount will be “received by” a TP if his intention was to benefit
from it for his own purpose.
Def: gross Of a capital CIR v Richmond Estates (Pty) Ltd:
income nature-intention TP can change his intention. The mere fact that TP sells his capital
asset cannot result in profit being of an income nature.
COT Southern Rhodesia v Levy:
If the TP has mixed intentions, effect will be given to his
main/dominant intention.
Elandsheuwel Farming (Pty) Ltd v CIR
There should be a distinction between the intention of the
shareholders (and their previous history) and the intention of the
directors of the company.
Def: gross Of a capital CIR v Pick ‘n Pay Employee share purchase trust:
income nature-scheme Where the taxpayer participated in a scheme of profit‐making the
of profit making proceeds are revenue of nature and taxable as gross income.
Def: gross Of a capital CIR v Stott:
income nature- The right of a TP to realise his asset to his best advantage does
mixed/dual not necessarily changes the nature from capital to income.
intention
CIR v Nel:
Asset acquired with the intention to own it as an investment will
remain capital in nature where the disposal of it occurs to
unusual/special circumstances.
Def: gross Of a capital CIR v Nussbaum:
income nature- change If a TP has an original intention which is capital in nature and a
in intention secondary intention which is revenue in nature and the two
purposes are pursued simultaneously, then the secondary intention
would result in profits being treated as revenue in nature.
Natal Estates Ltd v SIR:
A change in intention implies something more than the mere
decision to sell an asset of capital nature. Consider all the facts
Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:
Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews
Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!
In een paar klikken geregeld
Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.
Direct to-the-point
Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jonelleholtz. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,60. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64257 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen
Laatst bekeken door jou
Essay ·
unit 5 assignment D2 (sales and personal selling)
Samenvatting ·
Samenvatting betonconstructies
Voordeelbundel ·
Recht en Horeca REH & Methoden en Technieken 2 ME2
Essay ·
Unit 19 Assignment 2 Example 2 (ACHIEVED DDM OVERALL)
Essay ·
Voting behaviour essay plan
