100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
International Commercial Transaction revision notes €4,28   In winkelwagen

Overig

International Commercial Transaction revision notes

1 beoordeling
 553 keer bekeken  3 aankopen
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Voorbeeld 2 van de 18  pagina's

  • 2 juni 2015
  • 18
  • 2013/2014
  • Overig
  • Onbekend

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: hkfergusson • 6 jaar geleden

avatar-seller
International Commercial Transactions
Revision


1. FOB Contracts AND CIF Contracts

a) FOB
- Free on Board. Seller agrees to deliver “over the ships rail” after this
buyer has full risk and obligations. Therefore, cheaper than other
contracts for buyer
-Pyrene & Co v Scindia Navigation Co (1954)- outlines 3 types of FOB
Contracts
1) Classic FOB- buyer nominates ship and port/bill of lading
in seller name/seller puts goods on board
2) FOB with additional services- same but where seller
organises shipment
3) where a mates receipt is used

-Scottish v Newcastle International v Otham Ghalanos ltd (2008)Lord
MANCE—comparing FOB to C&F said: it specifies port of shipment,
cannot be bought afloat as it requires shipment to a specific port, and
although seller may pay for the freight, the buyer takes all the risk and
benefit of any fluctuation in price or damage to goods at sea

-SELLERS DUTIES: ship goods by description to port of shipment
nominated
Pay handling and transportation costs and ship
goods on time
Load goods over ships rail and notify buyer of
shipment
-BUYERS DUTIES: pay price
Arrange shipping space/charter ship
Arrange insurance for the whole trip
Cost of unloading and delivery


b) CIF
-Cost, Insurance, Freight. Seller has to organise all of these in conformity
with buyers wishes.
-Arnhold Karberg v Blythe, Green, Jourdain & Co (1915)- affirmed what a
CIF contract is.. SCRUTTONit is not a contract that the goods will arrive
but a contract to supply goods complying with the contract CIF is NOT
simply exchange of documents, it is the sale of goods, performed by the
exchange of correct documents

, Hindley & Co v East Indian Produce - (1973)- sellers bought off 3rd party-
on strength of documents sold onto the buyer- goods arrived and no cargo
on board---sellers tried to say they were protected by
documentsKERRNO OVERSIMPLIFICATION TO SAY IT IS EXCHANGE OF
DOCUMENTSno difference between seller at sea or at port
THEREFORE, the first case may have caused confusion but the second one
has cleared it up

S17 SOGA 1979- property in goods passes when parties choose too.
S18 – property only passes when goods are ascertained
HOWEVER, for CIF contracts presumption is that property passes when
documents exchanged

S20 SOGA 1979- General presumption that risk passes with property
-Manbre Saccharine v Corn Products co (1919)- NO FOR CIF it passes
different time to property, when crosses ships rail!
-Law and Bonar v British American Tobacco- if stated as CIF and has
inapplicable terms these will be struck out

SELLERS DUTIES:
-Goods match description (Manbre Sacharrine-the size of bags constitutes
part of description....Bowes v Shard- rice delivered in March/april when
supposed to be Feb
-Duty to procure adequate documents: Invoice + Bill of Lading +
Insurance Policy
-Bill of lading must be clean, insurance must be reasonably adequate and
cover entire journey
-Groom v Butcher- if the buyer wants a specific kind of insurance they
must make this clear- here wartime cover not included risk is buyers
-Horst v Biddell – these documents must be dispatched to the buyer in
good time, at least before the goods arrive and buyer pays price in
exchange of them

BUYER DUTIES:
-Pay contract on strength of documents (Manbre Saccharrine- submarine
sunk goods 2 days before documents arrived- still had to pay price AND
THEN go sue insurance)
-must name port of destination...must take delivery....must secure any
import licences required

SELLER REMEDIES:
S49 SOGA- action for the price if property has not passed BUT also if it has
S50 SOGA – damages for wrongful rejection of goods

BUYERS REMEDIES:
Can sue for breach if does not receive conforming documents and goods!
Kwei Tek Chao v British Traders (1954)- accepted documents upon
inspection later discovering they were forged...still able to sue!

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper dobrien312. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,28. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 73243 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€4,28  3x  verkocht
  • (1)
  Kopen