100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Conflict and Crimes - Preparatory assignment about Counter-terrorism strategies €3,49
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  4.  
  5. Conflict and Crimes

Overig

Conflict and Crimes - Preparatory assignment about Counter-terrorism strategies

 1 keer verkocht

▪ What approach does Bjørgo take in arguing what could be useful strategies to prevent terrorism? o Do you find his approach convincing? ▪ What is the difference between deradicalization and disengagement? o Do you find this a useful differentiation? ▪ How, in your opinion, should go...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 1 van de 2  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 21 februari 2022
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Overig
  • Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Alle documenten voor dit vak (9)

Verkoper

avatar-seller
santosjoanaic

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Joana Inês da Costa Santos
Student number: 2732721
Conflict and Crimes

Preparatory assignment Tutorial 7.1

▪ What approach does Bjørgo take in arguing what could be useful
strategies to prevent terrorism?
o Do you find his approach convincing?
The author takes a holistic approach in identifying nine preventive mechanisms:
normative barriers, reducing recruitment, deterrence, disruption, protecting vulnerable
targets, reducing harm, reducing rewards, incapacitation, and facilitating
disengagement. I believe this approach provides an important tool to reflect on
terrorism prevention.
However, I can't entirely agree that these measures are enough. I think that it
assumes that terrorists are rational actors and, as we have read in Abrahams' article
and discussed in class, it might not be accurate. Taking the importance of fear of
punishment as an example, I do not think it can play a role if the individual or the
group at issue is irrational.
▪ What is the difference between deradicalization and disengagement?
o Do you find this a useful differentiation?
Deradicalization is the process of changing a belief system, questioning an
extremist ideology and renouncing it. In other words, it is to stop believing in an
ideology while embracing a new and mainstream mindset. As disengagement only
means that the visaed stops supporting the cause and contains their activity, which
does not mean they no longer agree with it. This differentiation can be helpful to spot
potential engagement in organizations since disengagement leaves space for a new
approximation which can be last likely in a deradicalization case.
However, what differentiates the two concepts is one's ideology and beliefs that
only the person at stake can know. That is to say, we can never really distinguish both
terms because we can't ever know what one believes or not precisely. In the example
used before (spot potential engagement), I do not know if this differentiation can be
used in practical terms by counterterrorist services with no way to know a suspect's
beliefs.


▪ How, in your opinion, should governments respond to 'foreign fighters
and their family members wanting to return?
o In particular: contrast the approach taken in Kenya and by
European countries.
Kenya accepts the fighters back, providing them with rehabilitation programs
for those arrested and then released and those in amnesty programs. However, they
also prosecute fighters if they have committed crimes.
In Europe, non of this happens; there are only a few examples of fighters or
fighters' families that returned home.
In general, I believe that the Kenyan approach is better not only for the fighters
and their families well-being but for the diminishment of the necessities that pushed

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper santosjoanaic. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64257 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€3,49  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd