Samenvatting
Summary Digital Health Communication
- Instelling
- Tilburg University (UVT)
Samenvatting voor het vak Digital Health Communication over alle hoorcolleges, werkcolleges en artikelen die zijn besproken
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 80 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 80 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
SUMMARY DIGITAL HEALTH COMMUNICATIONWeek 1 3
T1 Lecture 3
T1 Literature 7
Article: A theory-based online health behavior intervention for new university students: study
protocol. (Epton et al., 2013) 7
Article: A theory-based online health behavior intervention for new university students
(U@Uni:LifeGuide): results from a repeat randomized controlled trial (Cameron et al., 2015) 10
D1 Lecture 14
References 15
Week 2 16
T2 Lecture 16
T2 Literature 22
Article: Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: A critical
review of current literature (Hermsen et al., 2016) 22
Article: Effects of eating with an augmented fork with vibrotactile feedback on eating rate and body
weight: a randomized controlled trial (Hermsen et al., 2019) 25
D2 Lecture 28
References 29
Week 3 31
T3 Lecture 31
T3 Literature 35
Article: Theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions: a scoping review (Ryan,
Bergin & Wells, 2018) 35
Article: From self-reliers to expert-dependents: identifying classes based on health-related need for
autonomy and need for external control among mobile users (Smit & Bol, 2020) 39
D3 Lecture 41
References 42
Week 4 43
T4 Lecture 43
T4 Literature 49
Article: A cross-cultural comparison of the processes underlying the associations between sharing of and
exposure to alcohol references and drinking intentions (Geusens et al., 2019) 49
Article: A comparison of physical activity mobile apps with and without existing web-based social
networking platforms: systematic review (Petersen et al., 2019) 52
D4 Lecture 55
References 55
Week 5 56
T5 Guest lecture 56
D5 Lecture 61
References 63
,Week 6 63
T6 Lecture 63
T6 Literature 66
Article: The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: an
experimental study (Meppelink et al., 2015) 66
Article: A systematic review of tailored eHealth interventions for weight loss (Ryan, Dockray & Linehan,
2019) 68
D6 Lecture 70
References 72
Week 7 73
T7 Lecture 73
T7 Literature 75
Article: Skype or skip? Causes and consequences of intimate self-disclosure in computer-mediated
doctor-patient communication (Bol & Antheunis, 2022) 75
Article: The effect of screen-to-screen versus face-to-face consultation on doctor-patient communication:
an experimental study with simulated patients (Tates et al., 2017) 78
References 80
, WEEK 1
T1 LECTURE
Learning goal: understand the main factors increasing and decreasing the impact of digital
health applications
How impactful are digital health applications?
Impact – what is the evidence? – physical activity (Romeo et al., 2019)
• Aim: this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of
smartphone apps for increasing objectively measured physical activity in adults
• Current status:
o Which health behavior theories are employed most often?
o Which features are employed most often?
Theory use and implemented features in apps targeting physical activity
• App based on recognized behavior-change theory
o Social cognitive theory (e.g., theory of planned behavior)
o Principles of reinforcement
o Social influencers’ perspective
o Taxonomy of behavior change
• App features
o Visible display of steps
o Physical activity performance summary
o Goal setting
o Visual display of goal achievement
o Motivational prompts
Results
• No significant effect of app-based physical activity interventions – steps per day and
moderate-to-vigorous PA
• But: interventions were effective (significant) when the intervention duration was 3
months or less (compared with longer interventions)
• And: physical activity apps that targeted physical activity in isolation were more
effective than apps that targeted physical activity in combination with diet
Impact – what is the evidence? – healthy eating behavior (Villinger et al., 2019)
• Aim: this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of
smartphone apps for changing nutrition behavior and nutrition-related health outcomes
• Current status:
o Which health behavior change techniques are employed most often?
, Most implemented features in apps targeting eating behavior
• Goals and planning
• Feedback and monitoring
• Social support
• Shaping knowledge
• Comparison of behavior
• Associations
• Reward and threat
• Antecedent
• Self-belief
Results
• Overall, a small significant of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviors
and nutrition-related outcomes
• Only studies targeting short term (<3 months) and/or intermediate-term (3-6 months)
follow-up intervals yielded significant (small) effect sizes; effects of long term (>6
months) follow-up not significant
Other meta-analyses/reviews
• Medicine adherence: 7/11 studies mobile app increased medicine adherence (Pere-
Jover et al., 2019)
• Alcohol intake: brief web-based interventions decreased the number of alcoholic
drinks consumed (Oosterveen et al., 2017)
• Digital (web) school-based behavior change interventions increased fruit and
vegetable intake and physical activity and reduced screen time in adolescents
immediately after the intervention; effects not sustained at follow-up and no effects
for alcohol intake and smoking (Champion et al., 2019)
o Qualities of studies/evidence low – very low
Maximizing the impact of digital health applications: two main factors
• The effective components should be evidence-based (effective ingredient)
o The application employs features that target determinants from health
behavior theories / features that are based on established behavioral change
techniques
• The uptake of the application should be sufficient (effective dose)
o The app should be designed based on scientific theories of technology
acceptance and engagement. The app should be human-centered
A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies (Van
Gemert-Pijnen et al., 2011)
• “High-tech with a low impact”
• “Low impact” not because technology does not work
o Low support of health care professionals
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper ylsebatenburg. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 50843 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen