Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Workgroup answers
- Instelling
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (EUR)
They are the answers of all the workgroups
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 1 van de 3 pagina's
Voorbeeld 1 van de 3 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Essay question (30 points)Individuals are increasingly attempting to (2) challenge healthcare rationing decisions of
policy-makers through litigation based on human rights. This raises questions about the role
of courts in such disputes. Some commentators argue that courts should refrain from
reviewing healthcare rationing decisions taken by policy-makers whereas other
commentators emphasize the role of courts in actively safeguarding human rights in such
cases.
Task: In a MAXIMUM of 500 words, please discuss whether (or not) courts should engage
in a human rights-based review of healthcare rationing decisions taken by policy-makers.
In your answer, (1) explain what is meant by healthcare rationing; (2) explain, using
concrete examples, why healthcare rationing is relevant for human rights; and (3) discuss
whether (or not) courts should engage in reviewing, based on human rights law,
healthcare rationing decisions taken by policy-makers. Substantiate your arguments with
relevant scholarly and legal sources discussed during the course and indicated in the
course literature.
(1): ICESCR Art.12 & General Comment 14.
Use other case laws
European Court of Human Rights & European Convention of Human Rights
(3): No right or wrong answer. It is up to the state (large margin of appreciation)
Or the other way around, health care is a very important human right etc.
Case question 1 (30 points)
Facts:
Further to a road accident, Mr K was transported to an emergency clinic located in country
X. At the clinic, the doctors concluded that he had experienced a traumatic musculoskeletal
injury (an open fracture of his lower limb). The doctors at the clinic decided to include him in
a clinical trial comparing standard post-surgery wound management with a new therapy
called Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (hereafter: NPWT). Having determined that Mr K
was conscious, the doctors asked him to sign a document consenting to be recruited for the
study. Mr K signed the document.
After a surgery was performed, Mr K received from the doctors a written information sheet,
which included a diagram of the NPWT supported by verbal instructions on his role during
the continuation of the study. When he read the information sheet, Mr K claimed that he
was very unpleasantly surprised to realize that he was included in the NPWT group. He said
that when he was taken to the hospital, although he was conscious, his state was
compromised by the traumatic injury he had suffered, and he had limited ability to function
and understand what was in his best interest in terms of treatment and care. He accused the
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper mboul. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €3,39. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 53340 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen