College aantekeningen
Boesman and Lena notes
- Vak
- Instelling
- Boek
Boesman and Lena notes
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 5 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
gesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
Verkoper
Volgen
shankroger
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
1Boesman & Lena - notes
• many modern playwrights dispense with plot and are concerned solely with the articulation of the personal
existential quest, so that the audience is not presented with a coherent cosmos with its traditional measures
of harmony & meaning, but with a complex vision of dissolution
• action is free of linear extension of time, social action and defined location
• setting is unspecified and an acting force in its own right, not just a background to action
• characters are depicted as depersonalised, archetypal, everyman subjects stripped of heroism & functioning
as mouthpieces for points of view & states of mind rather than explorations of individual psychology
• playwright is the creator of literature for performance - multi-sensory nature of drama
• Boesman & Lena are two coloured people living in a squatter camp on the mud flats of PE who are forced to
witness the demolition of their shack by a bull-dozer
• Fugard depicts the fragmentation of the individual psyche under the pressures of a hostile society & the
painful realisation of being locked into a situation where choice has become obsolete
• Boesman & Lena are not merely ‘little men’, they are the downtrodden; ‘We’ve been thrown away.
Rubbishes’ (277)
• their actual predicament however, extends beyond being trapped by their very real socio-political situation
& their ethnic heritage to a plane which concerns their existence in a spiritual context
• much modern drama underlies the futility of man’s quest for self-validation in the face of devalued systems
of absolute belief, there are elements in modern plays which militate against this nihilism
• man’s impotent endeavours to pit himself against ‘a world in dissolution’ are revealed,
• Boesman & Lena a modern tragedy, not concerned with nobles or intellectuals who are free to make choices
• B & L deals with the common man, not acting but rather acted upon by forces beyond his control or
ultimate comprehension
• B & L social outcasts - representing the downtrodden, ostracised members of an oppressed race
• B & L depicts a situation in which there is very limited development as Fugard essentially wished to
communicate a complex vision of dissolution in a concentric plot without a solution
• ACT 1:
• opens on an empty stage in semi-darkness
• no recognisable frame of reference - atmosphere of bleakness, barrenness
• B enters ‘heavily burdened’ (239) & slumps down exhausted
• L appears, ‘similarly burdened’ (239)
• descriptions of B & L significant - defined only as ‘ciphers of poverty’ (239) whose ages have been obscured
by a ‘lifetime of hardships & dissipation’ (239)
• B & L further depersonalised as they are known by first names only
• exact nature of their relationship is nebulous but one might infer they have been living together for some
time as L is described as having been ‘reduced to dumb animal submission’ (239)
• stage directions crucial - furnish details which assist the audience in deriving an understanding of the
characters within their social & psychological contexts
• B & L are shoeless, L wears a ‘sad’ dress, & Boesman’s faded, torn sports blazer has a particular ring of
irony as it denotes membership of a privileged fraternity: his ‘membership’ extends only to being part of
the human race
• a sense of despair at their deplorable situation is introduced by the first words spoken in the play:
‘Here’ (239)
, 2
• for L, the world seems to be divided into ‘here’ and the intractable, unattainable ‘there’ - she defines ‘here’
as ‘this’ and ‘now’ which amounts to mud & misery - ‘tomorrow’ might be unknown with regard to
geographic location, but not its nature: ‘and that will be like this. Vrot’ (240)
• ragged Lena with her feet in the mud cursing and shaking her fist at the liberty of the bird is a dramatic
image, particularly of their plight as members of a cast-out race - yet in her frustration & anger, longing &
envy of the bird, she literally & figuratively rises above her physical exhaustion - defiance
• L’s subsequent dialogue highlights other aspects of their predicament such as her remoteness from Boesman
& the feeling of disharmony between the couple & their surroundings
• B undisguisedly belligerent & violent toward L
• L perceives the world as an alien force, believing the elements seem to oppose them, daunted by the vast
emptiness of the surrounding wasteland
• B & L are rejected by society because they are poverty-stricken coloured people, classified as 2nd class
citizens - locked into a situation in which they have no choice - ‘determinism’ (individuals have no free will
& cannot be held morally responsible for their actions)
• as the play develops however, we discover there are possibly limited, yet important areas in which they are
able to make choices
• B & L’s state of disharmony is conveyed through the progression of Act 1 - L sustains the illusion of a
conversation as Boesman remains mute - morose & aggressive
• L’s desire to make sense of life is fundamentally a quest for identity, a ploy to validate her existence. Her
tentative unravelling & ordering of places and events lead her to discovering when & how she got where she
is. When B tauntingly challenges her to ‘find herself’ (252) that is declare who she is, she rises to the
occasion: (252). L’s words, ‘I want to be Mary’ (253) take on biblical connotations - her implied bitter
comparison of B with Christ, ‘Wie’s die man’ echoes the biblical ‘Ecce homo - Behold the man’
• upon reflection, we become aware of L’s inner journey & its implication regarding the discovery of identity in
this scene (253)
• the physical & spiritual activities of the 2 characters are mutually reflexive - B is rather inactive, occupying
himself with the erection of another shelter - made no positive spiritual progress - as withdrawn &
belligerent as he was at the beginning of the play, answering L’s questions with taunts & threats of ‘a
bloody good hiding’ (253) - in contrast, L is hyperactive even if only circular - she makes tentative, yet
positive progress
• a steady build up of tension between B & L - L feels isolated & betrayed by B who openly rejects her: ‘You
think I want you?’ (244)
• as the impassive witness to B & L’s bitter battle, Outa is more than a mere catalyst in the dramatic action -
his arrival unlocks contrasting reactions in the couple which in turn reveal the complexity of their
frustrated desires - L’s impassioned plea for the company of ‘another person’ (258) endorses her
humaneness, ‘To hell with you! I want him’ (256) - B characteristically hostile, showing that he himself is not
above the very philosophy which has caused his own misery, namely racial discrimination ‘…Kaffer …’(256) -
on another level his reaction confirms his remoteness from mankind
• despite the fact that the characters interact, they remain completely isolated & removed from each other,
as there is no comprehension of each other’s needs.
• L’s loneliness & desire to have her life witnessed goad her into insisting on Outa’s presence - yet she also
suggests he might require help (256) - is her assistance of Outa an act of altruism or an almost aggressive
attempt into forcing him to lend ‘a pair of eyes’ (262) or both?
• outa’s silence does not inhibit L’s urge to describe her life to give it form & therefore significance - she
relates to him matters which she cannot share with B: the history of a failed relationship & failed
motherhood through the squalid details of several still-births, the fruits of which they buried ‘behind us
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper shankroger. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €5,16. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 79223 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen