100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Samenvatting Advanced Corporate Financial Management colleges €4,49
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  4.  
  5. Advanced Corporate Financial Management

Samenvatting

Samenvatting Advanced Corporate Financial Management colleges
 17 keer verkocht

Samenvatting van Advanced Corporate Financial Management van alle colleges, collegesheets en deel van de literatuur. Docent: H. Rijken. Opleiding: Master Business Administration - Financial Management. Summary of Advanced Corporate Financial Management.

Voorbeeld 4 van de 49  pagina's

Document informatie

  • Nee
  • De collegesheets bevatten al veel info. door de samenvatting heen zijn er hier en daar stukken toevo
  • 31 oktober 2015
  • 49
  • 2015/2016
  • Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Gekoppeld boek

book image

Titel boek:

Auteur(s):

  • Uitgave:
  • ISBN:
  • Druk:

Meer samenvattingen voor studieboek

Alles voor dit studieboek (3)

Geschreven voor

Alle documenten voor dit vak (2)

Verkoper

avatar-seller
BtB12

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Advanced Corporate Financial Management
Dhr. Rijken

College 1: Introduction, leverage decision

Long-term financing, corporate capital structure
- If a business is not healty you can’t fix it with finance solutions. The business
itself has to be oke, and in that case it is possible to gain more advantages with
finance solutions.

Financing risk: - solvancy  E/D ratio = Long-term risk  KE (= cost of equity)
- Net working capital (NWC) = Short-term risk  KD (= cost of
debt)
* A company can’t have high risk of both. Usually they have one of them.
* Financing risk is the risk of the debtholder. Business risk is the risk of the equity
holder.
* KE + KD = WACC

Business risk = risk of the firm’s assets when no debt is used. It is inherent in the
company’s operations. Many factors (bv. Sales risk & input-cost risk) affect
business risk and the more volatile these factors are, the riskier the company is.
Business risk is market based.
Financial risk = takes in account a company’s leverage. High leverage = high
risk to stockholders, because the probability that they don’t get their money back
is high, because of more debt.

- Inefficiency:
1) Information  costs
2) Agency conflict  costs

- Accounting based balance sheet is about the past.
Market based is about the future.
- Corporate finance (1): managing the balance sheet 




- Corporate Finance at different levels + (2) managing the cash flow needs
• Long term finance
(LT investments, capital structure)
• Short term finance, working capital management
(working capital management, net working capital)
• Liquidity management
("never" out of cash)
• Cash management
(organization of the payments flow)

Theory Long term financing: the capital structure
 Neoclassic theory
* A company is regarded as a black box. One goal, no conflicts of interest.
Business cashflows are given.



1

, * Perfect market: capital will flow to business opportunities with optimal risk-
return relationship.
No tax, no transaction costs, no information costs, no distress (market-
efficiency)
* Symmetric information (homogeneous perceptions and expectations) → no
agency costs
* Investors are risk-averse
→ Abstract framework to build financial models
Literatuur: - Chapter 2 (2.1-2.5) PDF file (niet alles letterlijk gelezen, formules
overgeslagen)
Valuation and Financing decisions in an ideal capital market
2.2 Defining an ideal capital market:
5 assumptions in ‘ideal capital market’:
1. Capital markets are frictionless (no taxes, transactions costs etc.)
2. All market participants share homogeneous expectations (information is free
available)
3. All market participants are atomistic (no one can affect the market
price)
4. The firm’s investment program is fixed and known to all investors
5. The firm’s financing is fixed

The purpose of studying theory under ideal conditions is twofold:
1. We gain insights into the effects of a firm’s decisions on the values and risk
of iets securities
2. Armed with an understanding of the effects of corporate financial decisions
under ideal conditions, we are in a better position to understand the
incremental effects (where the increment = vermeerdering smay be large)
of certain real-world factors (which constitute violations of one or more of
the ideal capital market assumptions) on both these decisions and their
effects.

2.4 The irrelevance of dividend policy
- If a firm’s captial investement and debt policy are fixed, then as the firm
increases its dividend, it will eventually have to finance such payments by issuing
shares. A dividend is actually a partial liquidation of the original shareholders’
interest in the firm. If a shareholder receives dividend he can restore his
proportional claim on the firm by purchasing some shares.

2.5The capital asset princing model
The Modern Portfolio Theory involves two basic constructs:
1. The statistical effects of diversification on the expected return and risk of a
portfolio
2. The attitudes of investors toward risk: they averse it, but they are tolerant of
risk to bear if it is sufficient compensated.
- Theory shows that around 30 numbers of securities is needed to gain an optimal
portfolio mix.
CAPM = A model that describes the relationship between risk and expected return
and that is used in the pricing of risky securities.
2.5.2 Market equilibrium (markt evenwicht): the capital market line (CML)
- CML = a line that is created by the choices available to investors in r – sigma
space, that is formed by the points representing the Rf security and M (=market
portfolio).



College 2: Leverage decision (1)


2

, Proposition Modigliani & Miller, MM1  Value
- In the neo-classic framework the company value is independent to the
financing decision. Only the asset value determines the value of a company.

Proposition Modigliani & Miller, MM2  Cost of capital
- In the neo-classic framework the total costs of capital are independent to the
financing decision.
WACC = gelijk aan Re bij 100% Equity. Ke = Business risk + financing risk * D/E
Assumptions:
1. Strict separation between business (assets) and financing decision (liabilities)
2. Always financing available, given the business cash flows.

 Definitions cost of capital in a MM world with corporate taxation
- With tax the finance decision does impact the value of the company.




- WACC = Kvv•(1-T)•(D/TV) +Kev•(E/TV) (definition)
- WACC = ρ _[ 1 - T•(D/TV) ] (derived)
- TV = E + D ( = market value E + market value D)
- Vu = CFu/market risk
- Vl = Cfu/market risk + (Kb*B/Kd)

 “anomaly”: Income Tax (MM + all tax)
- T1 = extra tax rate, in this case for example income tax.

 “view I”: Insolvency costs (Static Trade off theory)
- The risk of bankruptcy/default.
- Insolvency costs show up in:
1a) Direct costs (settlement costs, loss of tax credit due to net operating
losses)
= P(bankruptcy) x (costs settlement + tax credit)
1b) Indirect costs. Are far more important:
* suppliers / clients are less willing to do business (the strict separation
between business and financing disappears)
* conflict of interest between shareholders (option value) and
bondholders / banks (timing bankruptcy)
* bad reputation for investors etc. etc.
- 1a and 1b results in lower (expected) cash flows
1 2) an increase in business risk and financing risk, resulting in higher
financing costs, mostly an extra credit risk premium ( plus extra
equity risk premium)
- 1 and 2 results in turn to a lower company value (= insolvency costs)
- Wacc first goes down if D/E ratio is increasing, but at a certain point it will go up,
because of the higher risk of high debt.

 “view II”: Agency costs

 “view III”: Pecking order theory
- If you need cash you try to gain it in the following order:



3

, 1) Internal cash
2) Debt
3) Shares
4) Hybrid products
- A concept on leverage decision: Static Trade Off theory
 Trade off between tax advantages and bankruptcy costs, so it’s about the
amount of leverage a company prefers.
 Optimum is somewhere within an interval (given by business risk). There is
a target ratio.
- A concept on leverage decision: Pecking order theory
= Companies prioritize their sources of financing.
 Complete different perspective on capital structure decisions
 Information asymmetry between equity issuer and investor (managers know
more about the company than investors
 Does not seek for an optimal capital structure. There is no target ratio.
- No difference in characteristics between Static Trade off and Pecking Order firms
- MM theory is the base. From there we add all kind of things that contradict the
assumptions of a perfect market. (taxes, insolvency costs, agency costs, etc..)
- The financing risk can influence the business risk. Because a companies relations
want continue business. They don’t want that one company out of the
‘productionline’ goes bankrupt.

Overview concepts on capital structure (toolbox)
- Bottom line: Asset Risk versus Financing Risk
 Asset Risk and Financing Risk must be somewhat balanced in such a way
that insolvency costs are at a reasonable/acceptable level for most
investors.
 A “first order” estimate of what a firms capital structure should be is
determined by
- Life cycle
- Size
- Sector
Life cycle, size, sector are first order indicators of asset risk
- a mature company has on average 60% debt. A start up has 100% equity and a
growth/innovative company 80-90% equity.

Target capital structure is strongly related to the sector (business characteristics)
1 Trade Industry Con Service
- (example) proxies for business risk
2 * Salary costs / sales - +/- +/- ++
- fixed / variable costs
1 * Profit - +/- - +
- cash flow level
- (example) proxies for financing risk
1 * Collateral ++ + +/- -
2 * Target capital structure 25% 45% 30% 30%
- Each industry has different leverage intervals. (bv. Finanical services 85-70% &
retail 30-10%)

Views / concepts on capital structure decisions
 Bottom line (large picture)
- Balance between business risk and financing risk (insolvency costs)
 Academic concepts
- Static Trade off theory
- Pecking Order Theory


4

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper BtB12. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64257 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis

Laatst bekeken door jou

Voordeelbundel ·

(0)

ALL IN ONE NURSING PACKAGE DEAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 2024/2025 ALREADY GRADED A BY EXPERTS
€4,49  17x  verkocht
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd