100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Eerder door jou gezocht
Eerder door jou gezocht
logo
Conflict of Laws Summary + Weekly Questions (week 6-12) €25,49
In winkelwagen
Snel navigeren naar
Voorbeeld
  2.  
  3. Tilburg University (UVT)
  4.  
  5. Conflict Of Laws

Samenvatting

Conflict of Laws Summary + Weekly Questions (week 6-12)

1 beoordeling
 2 keer verkocht

The summary contains the weekly topics which are discussed throughout the course and the weekly guiding questions with the relevant 7 steps and answers. The document provides an overview of how to analyse PIL Questions in the Exam and contains the following topics: 1) Jurisdiction I: intro & choice...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 80  pagina's

Document informatie

  • 19 juni 2022
  • 80
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Geschreven voor

Alle documenten voor dit vak (18)

1  beoordeling

review-writer-avatar

Door: alexblockie2022 • 2 jaar geleden

Verkoper

avatar-seller
sabecke

Ontvangen beoordelingen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Weeks PIL Question Case examples Instruments

Week 6 Jurisdiction ● 2 companies Brussels I-bis
with CoC Regulation
Clause

Week 7 Jurisdiction Brussels I-bis
Regulation

Week 8 Jurisdiction Brussels I-bis
Regulation

Week 9 Recognition and ● Brussels I-bis
Enforcement Regulation
● The Hague
Choice of
Court
Convention

Week 10 Choice of Law: ● Rome I
Contract ● CISG
→ Applicable Law

Week 11 Choice of Law:
Contract
→ Applicable Law

Week 12 Choice of Law: Tort ● Rome II
→ Applicable Law ● The Hague
Traffic
Accidents
Convention
● The Hague
Product
Liability
Convention




Week 6 - Jurisdiction I: intro & choice of court
Brussels I-bis Regulation

Scope


Substantive scope: Art. 1
● Art 1(1): Civil and commercial matters

, ○ contract law
○ tort law,
○ company and property law
○ → autonomous concept at EU level (no distinction between MS what
the definition entails) e.g. compensation for war crime by a state
would be still in a public law matter
● Art 1(2): Excluded: family law and law of persons, bankruptcy, social security, arbitration

● LTU v. Eurocontrol: objectives of convention / regulation and general principles in all MS
(thus contract with public authority that acts in exercise of its powers excluded)



Temporal Scope Art 66 and 81
● 10.01. 2015 is the relevant date
● If the proceedings started after that date
● It does not matter when the tort took or contract took place
● Date when the proceedings started not when the contract was concluded
● Art 81 & 66 → when the proceeding started
● Jurisdiction: when proceeding started
● Applicable Law: when the contract was concluded



Geographical scope: main rule Art.4-6
● = which criteria apply to limit the application of this instrument
● Art 4: Main rule: Defendant has to be domiciled in EU-MS (see Art. 62 and 63)
○ How to know the domicile:
● Article 62: if the defendant is a natural person → refers to national law
● Article 63: if the defendant is a legal person (business with legal personality)unified for
EU; applicable to find out the domicile
○ 3 different places where the legal person can have the domicile Art 63(1)
■ Statutory seat Art 63(1)(a) or
■ Central administration Art 63(1)(b) or
■ Principle place of business Art 63(1)(c)
- → met if one of them is in the EU
- If companies have different places in Art 63, then multiple domicile
- Art 63: defendant’s domicile is in _
- Domicile is not sufficient when there is a CoC Clause or weaker party is
involved etc → different geographical scope in Art 25,...


Main rule Art 4 Step 4
Alternative jurisdiction rules Art 7-9 Step 4
Special rules (e.g. for consumers, Art 10-23 Step 3
employment, insurance)

,Exclusive jurisdiction rules Art 24 Step 1
Forum clause Art 25 Step 2
Tacit submission Art 26 Step 5
→ not in a chronological
Lis pendens Art 29-34 order
Provisional/protective Art 35


○ 4 different Articles to apply an alternative geographical scope to Article 4

Exception to main rule in Art 4-6 / alternative geographical scope

a. Is Art 24 applicable? Immovable Property?
b. Is Art 25 applicable? CoC Clause?


1. Exceptions to main rule Art 24 and Art 25 → regardless of domicile of the
parties

, Article 24: Exclusive Jurisdiction - Property
(→ one court has the power to adjudicate a case to the exclusion of all other courts; no other court
than listed)
➔ regardless of the parties’ domicile

● Article 24: 5 different individual grounds of exclusive jurisdiction
Different Geographical Scope to main rule
● Art 24(1): Court of the country where the immovable property is located will have
exclusive jurisdiction to deal with matters regarding this immovable property.
○ Immovable property needs to be located in MS of EU
○ If so → the regulation is geographically applicable and the courts of
the country where the property is located, will have exclusive
jurisdiction to deal with those matters
○ → country that has the closest connection where the property is
located
○ Parties cannot agree that another court has jurisdiction
○ This court determines whether it has jurisdiction acc to Art 24(1) and exclusion
of all other court in EU

⇥Limited to rights In rem: rights that bind everyone erga omnes;
⇥e.g. selling house - contractual rights and personal right → not part
of Art 24


● Art 24(1) Exception
○ However, in proceedings which have as their object tenancies of immovable
property concluded for temporary private use for a maximum period of six
consecutive months, the courts of the Member State in which the defendant is
domiciled shall also have jurisdiction, provided that the tenant is a natural
person and that the landlord and the tenant are domiciled in the same Member
State;
○ → court where the immovable is located + court where the defendant
is domiciled
○ if both claimant and defendant have a common HR in same country, then
another court of a MS (courts where the defendant is domiciled) should have
exclusive jurisdiction alongside the country where the property is located if the
dispute relates to a short term tenancy of less than 6 months
● Art 24(2)
○ In case of validity, nullity, dissolution companies:
■ Courts of place of seat of company (deal according to national law)
● Art 24 (4)
○ In case of registration or validity; IP rights, trade marks patent, place deposit or
registration,...
■ GAT v. Luk: applies regardless whether validity is raised by way of an
action or as a plea of objection (defence) (!)

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper sabecke. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €25,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
€25,49  2x  verkocht
  • (1)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd