Samenvatting
Summary ALL LECTURES 1-4 COMPLETE OVERVIEW CONCEPTMAPS
Visually-pleasing concept maps for every lecture 1-4 for course human learning.
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 4 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 4 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
implications: associate events withVygotsky: children only learn through consequences
guidance & instruction from teachers
Piaget: children learn by discovering for
themselves -> rich learning environment
learning by means of
1. Discovery: child must be ready: Piaget's theories & rewards & punishments
must learn in learning environment & must Vygotsky's constructivism learner seen as
learn through cognitive conflict passive participant
Conceptual changes no room for error
(developmental theories) & Associations (behaviourism)
2. Interaction: Vygotsky assumes ZPD = area between what one already constructing knowledge
the Zone of Proximal Development. knows & what they can achieve with help (constructivism)
of more developed person.
Piaget: can make process through scaffolding
= support is adapted to current development + learning should take human learning = long-term changes Skinner: teaching machine ->
of knowledge/skills place in CONFLICT ins mental representations/associations as a rewarding, paying attention to each student (today: iPads)
criticism: results of an experience
1. role of teacher unclear Lecture 1: Opening Lecture Theories
3. Teacher more in the background (e.g. through PBL) 2. teacher too much in background ->
pupils can become insecure behaviour acquired through
modelling (observing &
imitating)
Encoding in memory learning is the encoding of
(cognitive theories) information in the brain
Imitation
attention is crucial for
(social learning Bandura: Bobodoll
encoding information -> it's limited tho
theory)
knowledge store
leading to: selective attention = one through
can only focus on a limited number schemas
info enter sensory register -> filtered / forgotten
of things at a time -> long term memory through repetition (info
working memory -> play
cannot always be recalled tho) self-regulation
role in active thinking processes has a limited capacity is very important
e.g. less efficient to
do hw with tv on 4-5 things at a time (otherwise info overload ->
thus: learning = the shirting of info from use external support e.g. notes)
working memory to long-term memory but once info is in long-term student models teacher
causing changes in schemas memory -> never be forgotten
theory of working memory:
Baddeley's tripartite visuospatial scratchpad + phonological loop
implications: to avoid working memory model -> meet at the central executive (where info is
overload -> better to learn in staggered way -> processed) -> responsible for cognitive processes
high retrieval & storage capacity
,
self-assessment = e.g. evaluation
one's own performance
1) Discrepancy reduction model = self-reaction = the
reducing discrepancy between where you incl. self-assessment emotional response to the
are vs your goal -> self-regulation & self-reflection performance
metacognitive regulation =
enable one to apply metacognitive monitoring = how learners monitor and control
checking whether task is being performed effectively their cognitive processes
3) self-reflection phase =
2) Region of proximal learning model = after execution of task
not everyone will continue to regulate until
self-monitoring ->
3 models of control: goal is achieves -> give up -> solution: divide
metacognitive knowledge = thinking about imagery & attention
goal in smaller steps
one's own learning -> about oneself & task focussing
3) Agenda based learning model = e.g. having to study self-control & self-observation ->
people have an agenda ->other factor but the weather is 2) performance phase = during task
Flavell: metacognition = self-observation e.g. students observers
influence self-actualisation behaviour nice outside which learning strategies
self-monitoring = "thinking about thinking"
awareness of what one thinks he applies
and how one learns
metacognitive monitoring = monitoring ->
someone knows strengths/weaknesses metal-level receives control & monitoring -> flow of
of his own learning info from object level info between the levels self-regulation 1) forethought phase = before performing self-motivation includes
Metacognitive goes through 3 phases: (cycle) the task (task analysis & self-motivation) e.g. self-efficacy
monitoring &
control -> metacognitive control
metacognitive control -> someone
uses strengths/weaknesses to object level receives
regulate their behaviour info from meta-level
Zimmerman's model of e.g familiarity: feeling
Metacognition metaocognition you have mastered material
Nelson & Narens model:
possible errors: one not knowing
their own (in)competence e.g. fluency:
1) meta-level = Lecture 2: Metacognition, self-monitoring and self-regulation learning is smooth
metacognition & 2) object level = things like
meta-memory cognition & memory
e.g. current knowledge:
Self-monitoring underestimating difficulty
metacomprehension = how well
one thinks they understood the text e.g. association heuristic:
learned material without its strong
associations, material out of control
can be improved in 4 ways: completion used for
explanation of a problem
accuracy of minoring (secondary education)
1) delayed keywords Monitoring within
generally low
different domains: Metacognitive monitoring metacognitive monitoring includes
2) delayed summaries in kids & adults judgements of learning (JOLs) =
memory tasks -> judgements one makes about how well they
+ no delayed-JOL effect 3) self-explaining delayed JOL used have learning info
kids DO monitor learning ( +
text comprehension -> difficulty regulating them tho)
4) creating draft folders generation strategies used
During school: JOL accuracy + aka a prediction one makes about
problem-solving tasks -> other how likely it is they use same Nelson & Dunlosky: delayed JOLs
regulation accuracy increase
strategies used to increase JOL action for same problem were BETTER than immediate JOLs
= generation effect -> info better
remembered -> situation model + pupil's overestimation of
created (mental model) own abilities decreases
1 & 2 -> delayed generation effect
-> info retrieved from sit. model of 3 & 4 -> immediate generation effect
long-term memory -> sit. model created on the spot
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper jowiepoon. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,89. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 52928 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen